Entry tags:
daf bit: Eruvin 96
In addressing what can be carried on Shabbat, the talmud discusses
t'fillin (phylacteries) that have been found. These are ritual objects
and will be missed by their owner. This leads to a discussion of whether
t'fillin are worn on Shabbat; Rabbi Akiva says yes, while others say no.
How can R. Akiva say this when he elsewhere said that t'fillin are a sign,
and we don't need a sign on a day that itself is a sign?
This relies on a Tanna who said that t'fillin may be worn at night,
and if night is a proper time for wearing t'fillin then certainly
Shabbat is. The Akiva question is not here resolved, but the g'mara
notes in passing that Michal the daughter of the Kushite (I don't
know who this is) wore t'fillin and the sages did not attempt to prevent
her. The g'mara then goes on to discuss other things, not taking up the
question of women wearing t'fillin. (96a)
Modern practice: t'fillin are worn only during the day, not on Shabbat, and not by women. Liberal and egalitarian communities disagree on the last point, and apparently some S'fardim consider it optional for women.
(Today's daf is 97.)

no subject
no subject
(My Conservative-minyan mentor -- the same one who told me "you need to learn to lead the service", then "you need to lead Hallel", and then "you should consider a tallit; that would be totally ok here" -- recently told me "we have loaner t'fillin, *nudge*". Someday perhaps he will teach me and I will consider. We'll see. I don't know why wearing a tallit feels perfectly reasonable but t'fillin is a mental hurdle for me.)
no subject
no subject
So part of me assumes there's something more there, some restriction or later interpretation that moots it, but I haven't encountered it yet.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
A tallit, however, could be considered wearing the clothes of the opposite sex, which there is a prohibition against.