cellio: (B5)
Monica ([personal profile] cellio) wrote2014-08-31 05:38 pm
Entry tags:

ISIS et al

Dear Mr. President,

Please allow me to propose a strategy for dealing with ISIS, since you've said you don't have one but seem to be reaching for the "fire" button for a war that does not have clear national objectives. Please try this one instead:

"Dear Arab world: You sow what you reap. You arm, finance, and encourage Hezbollah, Hamas, and Al Qaida on the one hand but look to us to bail you out from ISIS and friends on the other. What chutzpah. Until you decide that terrorism and brutality are not acceptable even when directed against Jews and westerners, you're on your own. Let's see how that works out for you."

Seriously, why are we even considering helping Syria??? Yes, I know there is a humanitarian crisis. There was one before ISIS too, at Assad's hands. Government-directed humanitarian crises have a long and sad history in the middle east.

The state sponsors of terror will never change their ways if they know they can get our help when those terrorists turn their gazes palace-ward. This is not our fight, and it'll be good for them to learn a lesson, even though there is a civilian cost. We should stay out of it.
richardf8: (Ensign_Katz)

[personal profile] richardf8 2014-09-03 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
I suspect this too has more to do with the US than with Netanyahu. If Obama puts the kibosh on weaponry, the military advantage disappears pretty quickly. During the course of the recent action Obama actually interfered with a shipment of Hellfire missiles. This is the way the US treats its ally. He really doesn't understand the Hamas and ISIS are the same thing. I'm to the point where, if he wants to go squander blood and treasure in Syria, meh, Gae Gesuntaheit. Maybe it'll teach him something about the nature of evil.