cellio: (avatar-face)
Monica ([personal profile] cellio) wrote2014-10-02 11:37 am
Entry tags:

text and subtext

Message from landlord: "In accordance with city ordinance blah blah, we will be conducting a mandatory evacuation drill on $date at 10AM."

Implied message from landlord: "Unless you particularly want to walk down 43 flights of stairs, that might be a good day to make other plans."

Unknown: whether the latter was intended -- fewer people in the building means fewer people who can mess up a compliance-check, after all. Though this would have been more plausible if they'd called it for 8AM rather than 10.

On a tangent, I wonder how people with mobility impairments get out of office buildings during alarms. There's no job-related reason I couldn't have a coworker in a wheelchair, after all, so somebody must have thought this through. (Please let somebody have thought that through...) Do they keep an elevator in service in that case (even though elevators are normally disabled during fire alarms), or is the floor warden responsible for rounding up people to carry the person downstairs, or what?
goljerp: Photo of the moon Callisto (Europa)

[personal profile] goljerp 2014-10-03 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
I dunno how they handle it there, but in NYC, they now have a law requiring drills twice a year, I think. However, the drills at $OLD_COMPANY (which at the time was located right near Penn Station), consisted of 'Go out into the hall, and listen to a grizzled retired fireman tell you about what to do in various emergencies, as well as a brief rundown of the various stairways'. We never actually went down any stairs as part of the drill. The building itself was 50+ stories, although my office was below the 10th floor. As far as what to do if one was unable to walk down N flights of stairs, I think they said to check in with the building staff to let them know there was someone who required assistance; I think that a firefighter / building security would help said people down. At least in NYC (probably for reasons due to recent history), they were not suggesting people necessarily 'shelter in place' (although that was, of course, mentioned as a possible option).