Entry tags:
conflict of values
I recently traveled for business, and the hotel where I stayed -- as is becoming the norm in my limited experience -- asked clients to consider not having linen service every day to avoid waste. I don't replace my towels and sheets at home every day and I really don't need somebody else to make the bed (in the room I have to myself), so I've been on board with that for a while.
One morning as I was leaving my room, with the "do not disturb" sign on the door, I ran into one of the housekeepers. The conversation went something like this:
Her: You don't want me to clean your room?
Me: No it's ok; I've only used these towels once.
Her: Are you sure? It wouldn't be any trouble!
If I'd been caffeinated I might have picked up on the subtext, but it wasn't until later that I found myself wondering: is this policy costing people jobs? I'm guessing that very few people become hotel housekeepers if they have other options; is my desire to go gently on the planet at odds with my desire not to make it harder on people in low-end jobs who want to work?
This is far from the first time I've faced the "but the candle-makers will go out of business if we adopt lightbulbs!" idea, but this may be the first time that the "other side" of the issue isn't either convenience or economics but, rather, a liberal value. I mean, I pump my own gas even though there used to be people who do that, and I'm fine with that. I'd use the grocery self-checkout if it worked better, but I find the human cashiers to be faster and more accurate. I do stuff online that used to require dealing with a (paid) human being. Somehow this feels different. I'm not sure if I should care, but I did take notice of it.
I left a decent tip on check-out day.
One morning as I was leaving my room, with the "do not disturb" sign on the door, I ran into one of the housekeepers. The conversation went something like this:
Her: You don't want me to clean your room?
Me: No it's ok; I've only used these towels once.
Her: Are you sure? It wouldn't be any trouble!
If I'd been caffeinated I might have picked up on the subtext, but it wasn't until later that I found myself wondering: is this policy costing people jobs? I'm guessing that very few people become hotel housekeepers if they have other options; is my desire to go gently on the planet at odds with my desire not to make it harder on people in low-end jobs who want to work?
This is far from the first time I've faced the "but the candle-makers will go out of business if we adopt lightbulbs!" idea, but this may be the first time that the "other side" of the issue isn't either convenience or economics but, rather, a liberal value. I mean, I pump my own gas even though there used to be people who do that, and I'm fine with that. I'd use the grocery self-checkout if it worked better, but I find the human cashiers to be faster and more accurate. I do stuff online that used to require dealing with a (paid) human being. Somehow this feels different. I'm not sure if I should care, but I did take notice of it.
I left a decent tip on check-out day.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Economics can be cruel, and increased efficiency can also be cruel. A smaller human footprint can mean fewer jobs. There is no simple answer that I am aware of. Change brings change, and can harm the most vulnerable among us more than others.
no subject
no subject
As it should.
no subject
But having the bed made, the trash emptied, the amenities re-stocked, etc. are still things I want done even if I'm ostensibly supporting the environment (and I will admit I'm actually a towel hog in hotels, although that's dropped some now that I usually bring my own bath sheet because it's big enough for me).
I do suspect there's an economic impact on people not wishing their rooms cleaned, etc... and, because there is no guarantee that the same person will be cleaning my room each day, I leave a note with tip daily during my stay; the houseman inappropriately took the tip I'd left for the housekeeper on the last day of my stay, as it turns out, but there were many other issues with him as well).
Just my experiences... YMMV of course and thanks for getting me to ponder all this!
no subject
That's a very good point. I was treating them the same but they aren't.
I've seen those signs in some hotels. Oddly, this one did not have any evidence of that convention; they asked guests to "go green" and not change towels and bedding every day, but the only obvious way to do that was to not service the room. (I suppose one could leave a note.)
I do leave a tip on any day I have the room serviced, not just the last day. That way the person who does the work gets the tip. (I hope it's that rather than they get pooled, anyway.)
no subject
The card's absence, of course, isn't as noticeable as -- say -- a Do Not Bisturb sign but there was likely supposed to be one and you didn't have it. I always ask the front desk for a DnD sign when it's not in evidence. Likely same thing would work for the "I want to be green" option? if, in fact, you do.
;-)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I don't like the self-checkout in the supermarket - and it had occurred to me that this is a job-maintenance issue, though that's not the only reason I don't like the automated version.
But I'm sure there's some equivalent thing that I'm doing without noticing the implications!
no subject
I don't like the self-checkout in the grocery as currently implemented; I have to do way too much work for produce, I can't parallel-process the bagging so it feels like it's bogging the line down, and if there is any problem at all I have to wait for somebody to take notice of me and come help. But I've used self-checkout in stores where it's easy to scan and go (no produce, not a lot of stuff, etc), and while part of me notes the job impact another part of me notes the efficiency. I do fear that, as with gas stations here, this is the way of the future and before too long we won't have the option of human cashiers.
no subject
A recent trivia question on the radio: 52% of us love it, 12% of us feel stupid using it, the rest just hate it. The answer was self check-outs. I prefer human check out clerks. I don't think it's the math, it's letting someone else bag.
Interesting observation on the hotels. I'll have to think about it.
no subject
Bagging is a factor. I don't mind bagging myself, but with a human cashier we can parallel-process. With the self-checkout, I can scan or bag but not both, so the whole thing takes, if not twice as long, at least half-again as long.