daf bit: Kiddushin 48
Apr. 28th, 2016 08:56 amWhen a man betroths a woman he must give her something of (at least small)
value. Today we use a ring, but it could be anything so long as its value
can be ascertained. The mishna teaches: if a man says to a woman
"be thou betrothed to me with this wine" and it's found to be honey
or "with honey" and it's found to be wine; or "with this gold dinar" and
it's found to be silver or "with this silver dinar" and it's found to be
gold; or "on condition that I am rich" and he's found to be poor or
"on condition that I am poor" and he's found to be rich -- in all these
cases, she is not betrothed. R' Shimon says: if he deceived her to her
advantage (for example in the case where the silver coin turns out to be
gold), then she is betrothed. (48b)
I don't understand conditional betrothals. As far as I can tell this isn't about some future state (if I am wealthy when it's time to get married); betrothal takes effect, or doesn't, immediately, so the state of the condition must be known, right?
(no subject)
Date: 2016-04-28 01:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-04-30 01:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-05-02 04:13 pm (UTC)Bear in mind that big decisions had to be made with less information immediately available back before telecommunications were invented. Also, standard gender roles were, of course, much different, such that it was much more important for a woman to secure a husband to protect and provide for her, so it might be worth it to jump into a commitment without all of the relevant facts totally verified.
Also, of course, the Mishna and Gemara are full of thought experiments that may never have actually been realized, but were discussed and recorded to expose the core principles.
(no subject)
From: