cellio: (mandelbrot-2)
Monica ([personal profile] cellio) wrote2017-04-02 08:42 pm

link round-up

I have some things collecting in tabs, so here's a hodge-podge:

siderea: (Default)

[personal profile] siderea 2017-04-03 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
A lot of the Rands article The New Manager Death-Spiral sounds very familiar.

There's so much about Scadian culture that makes me want to throw up my hands in disgust and never think about it again, and then I read something like this and am reminded of why there's so much to love about it. I still have no idea how Carolingia, if not the entire Knowne World, got the "leadership means delegation" thing so very deeply and even militantly; I wish I did so I could spread it around.
siderea: (Default)

[personal profile] siderea 2017-04-03 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
Well, if one thinks of the Society as "just" a hobby or game, then it's perhaps surprising – though even games are educational. But if one thinks of the Society as countercultural, which it deeply is, one can think of it as a kind of laboratory for alternative ways to get things done – and in that sense, it's not surprising at all. It's almost the point.
metahacker: (doyouhas)

[personal profile] metahacker 2017-04-03 04:58 pm (UTC)(link)
The idea of leadership as delegation is sharply countercultural--it's the antithesis of "leadership" in the macho CEO stereotype style of leadership that corporate life pretends to like.

This despite delegation being a key skill taught in other similarly hierarchical organizations--notably the military, where being able to delegate, and assess the ability of your delegatees to carry out the task, are both considered crucial parts of the job as you move up the command chain.

I have to think it is because of the rotating cadre of supremely unqualified CEOs and middle managers who persist only because they claim what they're doing is effective despite all evidence to the contrary, while depending on lower-status folks to invisibly pick up the slack and make things actually work.

(Application to the current administration is left as an exercise for the reader.)
siderea: (Default)

[personal profile] siderea 2017-04-03 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Interesting point.
metahacker: Snapshot of an 80s game, showing a blue troll holding a big club (troll)

[personal profile] metahacker 2017-04-04 05:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh FFS, there's a _movie_ about this now?
jducoeur: (Default)

[personal profile] jducoeur 2017-04-03 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Fascinating. It never occurred to me, but now that you bring up clubs, I wonder if this is intentionally built into Freemasonry.

It's quite plausible: Masonry is all about teaching lessons through ritual, and one of the most deeply-set rituals is the way the Lodge runs. You achieve Leadership (being Master of the Lodge) only by passing through most of the Chairs under the Master, over a period (in a healthy Lodge) of 7-11 years. Each of those Chairs has specific responsibilities, and it is *not* cool to micro-manage. Delegation is more or less explicitly one of the key jobs of the Master of the Lodge, and by that point you have a good deal of experience with delegation up, down and sideways.

All far more formalized (and, amusingly, hierarchical) than the SCA, of course, but that's the nature of the clubs...