It was good to have a "real" Shabbat this week,
after dealing with Pennsic issues last week.
There was a bat mitzvah Friday night. If I had
known about this (or, more properly, remembered
-- I'd seen an announcement before Pennsic and
forgotten), I wouldn't have gone after the experience
of that annoying Friday-night bar mitzvah a couple
months back. But by the time I discovered this
it was too late to go somewhere else (and be on
time), so oh well.
This one went much better. It did not
intrude to the extent that the previous one did;
it was still recognizable as our congregation's
Shabbat service, instead of being a show revolving
around the kid. (I still hope we don't see this
sort of thing often, though. These should really
be done Saturday morning.)
At the oneg the rabbi told me something to the
effect of "that worked much better than last time,
eh?". I hadn't complained about the previous one,
but I guess he knows me well enough by now to have
predicted that. :-) He also told me there are some
changes that he's going to insist on from now on,
like keeping it down to three aliyot instead of seven.
If the family wants seven, they can do it on Saturday
morning like they're supposed to anyway. And he's
leaning on families hard to keep the thank-yous and
the "parental greeting" short. (This was the main
source of the annoyance last time.)
I think I actually got this information, unsolicited,
because I'm (nominally) co-chair of the worship
committee. Gee, that turned out to be handy for
something!
The girl's sermon was actually pretty well done
(albeit short). This week's portion includes
what's called the "tochecha", the long section
of dire curses that will befall Israel
if they don't keep God's commandments. (Deut. 29,
for the curious.) So she talked about what motivates
people under different circumstances and pointed
out that there are actually three motivators, not
the two that immediately come to mind: reward,
punishment, and obligation. By the last, she means
doing something because it's the right thing to do
and not because of rewards (or punishments) that
will come. Not a new thought to most adults, I
suspect, but it was nice to hear this coming from
a 13-year-old.
The morning Torah-study group has just reached
the discussion of kashrut in Leviticus, so
Rabbi Freedman brought some thoughts from a
(modern) source that I didn't note on the
question of "why these food laws?". A lot of
people think kashrut is about health, but that's
not really it. This source offered the theory that
we are forbidden to eat animals that have characeristics
we would not want to emulate -- e.g. we don't eat
carnivores because people should not kill aggressively,
we don't eat lions because they're seen as proud,
we don't eat scavengers, etc. ("You are what you eat"
taken to new levels?) This sounds weak to
me for two reasons: (1) there are forbidden animals
without obvious "problematic" characteristics, and
(2) if that were the reason, it wouldn't
just be about food -- we'd be forbidden to benefit
from those animals in any way, or so I suspect.
While the answer "because God said so" is usually
unpopular in liberal Judaism, sometimes I think it's
the correct answer. There will always be some
commandments for which we can't discern a reason,
after all. (There's even a name for them --
chukim.)