cellio: (Default)
[personal profile] cellio
Ruth Levenstein posted an interesting idea to a Jewish mailing list that I'm on.

It is generally held that the binding of Isaac (the Akeidah) was a test, and that Avraham passed the test by obeying the order to sacrifice his son. But maybe Avraham *failed* the test. Maybe passing the test would have meant protesting, as he did to protect S'dom and Gemorrah a few chapters earlier.

The story takes on a very different tone if you read it from this perspective.

(no subject)

Date: 2001-11-28 08:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amergina.livejournal.com
Woah. I'm gonna have to pull out my Bible (cause it and the Koran are all I have) and read that again.

I never thought of that.

(no subject)

Date: 2001-11-29 07:52 am (UTC)
blk: (Default)
From: [personal profile] blk
For anybody interested, the relevent chapter (Gen 22) can be read here

Mentioning Sarah's death right after the sacrifice is interesting, but I don't think it came immediately after. Actually, if I look at some surrounding ages, I can get a guestimate: The passage mentions that Abraham's brother had children at the same time that Isaac was sacrificed. and Isaac married a cousin's daughter. Assuming "reasonable ages," At least 25-35 years should pass after the sacrifice before Rebekah was old enough to marry. Since Isaac was only 40 when he married, I believe he was fairly young when he was sacrificed. Sarah lived to see him reach 37, which hardly puts it soon after.

(no subject)

Date: 2001-11-29 11:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrpeck.livejournal.com
I don't see it. The verses right after the angel stops him describe the angel telling him how the Lord will bless him for his obedience.

midrash

Date: 2001-12-05 02:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlowe1.livejournal.com
It's midrash that Sarah died because she knew saw the Akeidah but it wasn't her test so she hadn't prepared herself for the shock of it. But I feel uncomfortable relating that because it is forbidden to teach oral Torah to non-Jews. Midrash is in that grey area however.

Time in Torah

Date: 2001-12-05 02:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlowe1.livejournal.com
Yeah, but you have to remember that the Torah doesn't tell things in a straight chronelogical setting. It will go on about the generations of Esav in one chapter which have to go for many years, and then goes back to talk about Joseph. Or it will speak about how long Ishmael lived before getting to Isaac.

SO pretty much what happens with Abraham is that Torah wants to get all the loose ends tied up in his story before moving on to the story of Isaac (which is pretty short as he's a transitional character)

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags