cellio: (Default)
[personal profile] cellio
Ruth Levenstein posted an interesting idea to a Jewish mailing list that I'm on.

It is generally held that the binding of Isaac (the Akeidah) was a test, and that Avraham passed the test by obeying the order to sacrifice his son. But maybe Avraham *failed* the test. Maybe passing the test would have meant protesting, as he did to protect S'dom and Gemorrah a few chapters earlier.

The story takes on a very different tone if you read it from this perspective.

(no subject)

Date: 2001-11-28 08:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeannegrrl.livejournal.com
I've heard this idea and it resonates with me. As further support for this view, I was also told that not only did G-d send an Angel to stop the sacrifice vs. intervening Himself, but after this, G-d never speaks directly to Abraham again....

Problems with the interpretation

Date: 2001-12-05 02:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlowe1.livejournal.com
G-d does speak to Abraham again to reward him.
G-d saying do and an Angel saying don't would weigh it more heavily to G-d. There are traditions about Satan trying to stop Abraham and Satan is an angel.
Isaac was 37, Abraham was 137 - it's difficult to tie someone to a rock and sacrifice them if they aren't willing to do it.

And Abraham is talking directly to G-d. He knows that there's an afterlife. He will simply be putting Isaac there.

Two other interpretations are Rabbi Friedman's (http://www.rabbifriedman.org)interpretation that the Test was listening to the angel. And proving that this world is important. Just as important as the next.

Rav Kook saw it as a Paradox. Dogma is the premature resolution of a paradox (I think that's how it goes). Abraham passed by seeing the Paradox through to the end.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags