Entry tags:
LOTR
We've been invited to dinner tomorrow by friends, so we went to see LOTR tonight. Well, first we went out for Chinese food (it's traditional), and the service was kind of slow, but we still made it to the theatre in time.
Side note: the theatre recording said the running time was 3:13, and I was curious about whether that included trailers. Commercials started at 7:29, trailers at 7:31, the movie at 7:41, and final credits started to roll at 10:30 sharp. We didn't stay through the credits, but unless they ran for more than 10 minutes their calibration was off.
But enough of that. The movie was visually stunning. The music worked really well -- which is to say, most of the time I didn't actively notice it but sometimes I did and it was setting the right moods. I still don't know how they shot some of the scenes with the hobbits and height differentials. (It apparently worked for the unaware: Dani asked me afterwards if the lead hobbits were played by mdgets.)
I hated the photography in most of the fight scenes, though I generally liked it otherwise. Yes, fights are fast and chaotic and you want to convey "action", but when things are actively jerky it just doesn't work for me. A secondary complaint about the fight scenes is the lack of tactics the combattants tended to show; I don't expect grand strategy, but you don't entirely stop a fight to watch someone die, nor do you run past an enemy and ignore a clear shot. Ah well, the price of high drama. :-)
But don't get me wrong -- I did enjoy the movie!
Side note: the theatre recording said the running time was 3:13, and I was curious about whether that included trailers. Commercials started at 7:29, trailers at 7:31, the movie at 7:41, and final credits started to roll at 10:30 sharp. We didn't stay through the credits, but unless they ran for more than 10 minutes their calibration was off.
But enough of that. The movie was visually stunning. The music worked really well -- which is to say, most of the time I didn't actively notice it but sometimes I did and it was setting the right moods. I still don't know how they shot some of the scenes with the hobbits and height differentials. (It apparently worked for the unaware: Dani asked me afterwards if the lead hobbits were played by mdgets.)
I hated the photography in most of the fight scenes, though I generally liked it otherwise. Yes, fights are fast and chaotic and you want to convey "action", but when things are actively jerky it just doesn't work for me. A secondary complaint about the fight scenes is the lack of tactics the combattants tended to show; I don't expect grand strategy, but you don't entirely stop a fight to watch someone die, nor do you run past an enemy and ignore a clear shot. Ah well, the price of high drama. :-)
But don't get me wrong -- I did enjoy the movie!

Hobbits
Re: Hobbits
I agree with you on the casting choice -- it's got to be pretty hard for actors who fall outside the usual size parameters to get roles at all, so if they're good actors, why not cast them when these opportunities come up? I suspect the answer is marketing -- you want big-name actors in your promos, so the unknowns remain unknown if it's a "big" movie.