questions from
ommkarja
2. What is the best job you've ever had? What did
you like about it?
( Read more... )
3. Aside from religion, what is one aspect of your
philosophy, beliefs, or lifestyle that has changed
significantly in your life? What motivated the change,
and how did you go about it?
( Read more... )
4. When you were growing up, who in your family did
you feel closest to? What was the best thing about that
relationship? Are you still as close to them now?
( Read more... )
5. Consider the following scenario: ( Read more... )
halacha: theory and practice
( Read more... )
brain meme
Caution (for the ~5 people on my friends list who haven't seen this yet): because I had seen others' results and knew approximately what the test set out to measure, I was a little more aware of meta-issues than was probably ideal. The test is here.
( results )
( comments )
Torah study
We spent a while talking about this verse this morning. We started out talking about gossip and ended up talking about whistle-blowing.
(Rashi interprets the first part as: don't be a peddler of tales, a "retailer" (I wonder who introduced the pun, him or a translator).)
We talked about how the Chofetz Chayim says that gossip harms three people: the subject, the speaker, and the listener. We talked about how a need to know can override (that's where the whistle-blower thread came from). For example, the talmud argues that if you know of evidence that would clear someone of an accuastion, you are required (under Jewish law) to testify to that effect. (The judicial system under Jewish law is very much weighted toward the defendant, in case you're wondering. It's not clear that a death sentence was ever carried out, for example.)
I asked if the talmud draws this conclusion based on the fact that "don't be a tale-bearer" and "don't stand by the blood of your neighbor" are linked in the same verse. (The rabbi said yes, that's right.)
Some people who were there didn't see the real harm in gossip; I guess it's part of current American culture. I'm with the Chofetz Chayim (though not nearly as careful as he was): spreading rumors can do a great deal of harm, and it's harm that's very hard to undo should you later determine that you were in error. It's tempting, but I try to resist. Often fail, but I try to do better.
One thing that makes gossip especially bad is that most people seem to be pre-disposed to believe what they're told; critical thinkers are in the minority, from what I've seen. One thing I've been trying to work on is to look for the positive (or at least neutral) explanation for what appears to be bad behavior. And y'know, sometimes that guess even turns out to be right. Nifty when that happens.
Ok, I'm a sheep
Introverted (I) 61% Extraverted (E) 39%
Intuitive (N) 55% Sensing (S) 45%
Thinking (T) 85% Feeling (F) 15%
Judging (J) 55% Perceiving (P) 45%
The quiz -- a subset of the full Myers-Briggs test, worth what you paid for it, but interesting anyway. The real MBTI has some serious methodology issues, so it always boggles my mind to hear of places that use it seriously, like a past employer of mine tried to do. But as cocktail-party fodder, it's just fine.
answers, part 3
Do you have any big regrets?
Yes.
Oh, that's probably not the question you really wanted to ask. Ok, I can elaborate. :-)
The only time that I initiated a breakup of a romantic relationship, it played out badly and I feel that this was largely my fault. I'm not certain what specifically I could have done better, but I'm sure I could have handled it better in some way. The other person got hurt pretty badly (though he tried not to let it show), which was certainly no one's intent, and the friendship has never been the same. (It wasn't a hostile breakup; it was more of a "this isn't going to work" situation.)
Somehow you are on my read list.... do you know how you got there because I don't remember...
I don't know. As far as I know we don't know each other in real life, and we don't appear to have friends in common right now. Maybe we did and you saw me on a "friends of friends" list, or maybe you surfed randomly or via similar interests?
How far is your shul from where you are and how long does it take you to walk there?
Approximately 1 mile (less as the mole digs, but that's not an accurate measure of surface distance -- it just means don't trust maps in Pittsburgh). It takes me about 20 minutes to walk there on average. I can rush it in 15 minutes or so, but I rarely feel the need to rush on Shabbat.
Would you mind telling your conversion story (the long version)?
I don't mind. Let me try to figure out the best way to bridge the gap between the short summary and the longer version that, among things, manifested in approximately 150 pages of journal at the time. This may take a few days.
Actually, here's an oddball question (which is not, itself, an answer to your question, but more of a tangent): I could post that journal over a similar span of time in a different LJ ("reruns"?). It would take about a year altogether. (I think there's value in not just reading it all at once. I can't just post the entire thing as-is anyway, as I have to edit out people's real names and stuff like that.) Would this be at all interesting to anyone? Don't worry; I'm not using this as a way to blow off your question.
I'll also entertain more-specific questions by email, if that helps any. The hardest thing about trying to tell a big story is figuring out the parts that would be seen as interesting and significant to others.
answers, part 1
Coming up sometime after Shabbat: more on religion, a visit from Dr. Science, and assorted others. Keep 'em coming.
google check
One of the links to the dance book is in Cyrillic, oddly enough, so I now know one way to transliterate my name into that character set. I wonder if it's a phonetic transliteration and, if so, how the author thinks my last name is pronounced.
There's a link to a page of credits for Common Lisp: The Language. (I was an undergrad assistant, and can actually point to some of my words in the finished book.) There's also a link to a recipe that an SCA friend named after me, which I didn't realize he had published with that name until more recently.
It's not until link #54 that you get the first reference to a lawsuit I was involved in some years back, and that's for the award of attorneys' fees and costs, which means no one can reasonably claim it was a frivolous suit. (Oddly, I don't recognize the site that archived that.) Hints that this journal exists start showing up in the 40s, but you'd have to already know about LJ to recognize them. (The journal itself isn't indexed, but that doesn't prevent interest lists and the userinfo page from showing up.)
All in all, I think potential stalkers would get bored. Which is the correct outcome. :-)
Update: This entry was inspired by
this article, which was pointed out by
browngirl. (Nothing new here for me, but it's a good summary/overview.)
the musical wiring of my brain
I play hammer dulcimer (well), bodhran (competently), hand drums/tambourines/etc (minimally), and bowed psaltry (basically competent). I had several years of piano lessons as a child, but can't do anything more than very basic stuff now (oops). I used to play appalachian dulcimer a little, but haven't in years. I've played around with harps a little bit, but never learned to play.
I tried to learn folk guitar when I was in high school, but my fingers were too short to chord correctly. (They probably still are, though back then I didn't know that there were guitars with narrow necks for people like me.) I also had trouble wrapping my brain around this "non-linear" instrument; at that point the only instrument I had played was piano, where the notes were nicely in a row from lowest to highest. Of course that's true on a fret board as well, but the parallelism of doing it six times with offsets confused me. Still does, somewhat, though I've played really simple bass lines (electric bass) on a couple songs that On the Mark does. Really simple, though. And I memorized the relevant fret/string positions; if you asked me to find a particular note (that's not an open string) I would have to stop and compute. That gets better with practice, of course, but I find it challenging.
I have played around with recorders a bit, but haven't put the time in to actually achieve competence. I find learning the fingerings to be hard.
The conclusion I draw from all of this is that while I am good with timing and rhythm, I am not so good with fingerings, especially if I have to move several fingers at once in order to change pitch. I think of music "horizontally", not "vertically", and I think of notes as single things that you do, not aggregates of multiple actions. (This horizontal/vertical thing applies to singing, too. I can sing arbitrarily-complex counterpoint, and stand a decent chance of sight-reading it not too badly, but close harmony drives me batty as a singer, as does your stereotypical randomly-jumping-around alto line.) Obviously I can play instruments that use all the fingers, as I was competent on piano lo these many years ago, but I suspect the linear nature of the instrument makes a big difference for me.
If all of this is true, then it should be a predictor of other instruments that would be good, or bad, for me to try. It's a pity that cello or viola da gamba is probably on the "bad" side of that evaluation; I love the sound of deep, rich, bowed strings.
Triskaidekaphobia meme
Thirteen things that have been going really well for me:
1. Interesting work. I get to do technical writing for programmers, rather than for end users. And I'm good at it.
2. I work for a company that treats its people really well. I'm not talking about money (though the pay is competitive); I'm talking about the things that really matter on a day-to-day basis, like respect and professionalism.
3. I have a great relationship with my rabbi. I am thrilled that he is willing to learn with me one on one. How many people get that opportunity without enrolling in yeshiva?
4. I'm having even more fun than I expected to in
ralphmelton's
D&D game.
5.
ralphmelton,
lorimelton, and
mrpeck
have gone from being casual acquaintances/coworkers to being really good
friends (with me, I mean :-) ), initially through the mechanism of
Sunday dinner.
6. I heard a bunch of great music at a recent convention and have gotten a couple of friends hooked on Clam Chowder (the group, not the soup).
7. I'm getting to know a lot of interesting people through LJ, some of whom are friends in real life.
8. I've been filling in occasionally for a congregation that doesn't have a cantor, on Friday nights. Not only am I doing a good job, but they really like me.
9. Soon, I will be able to move my office upstairs out of the cold basement. Shelves are being installed in the new room, possibly as I write this.
10. On the Mark sounds really good with the new lineup.
11. My SCA group is being reasonable in the face of unreasonable demands from above. It didn't look like it was going to play out this way.
12. Dani, my family, and the cats are all healthy and doing well.
13. I have lost enough weight that people have noticed, though not as much as I need to (nor as quickly as some of my friends are losing it), without doing anything more formal than paying attention to what I eat and trying to walk more.
attitude shift (fulfilling a request...)
I didn't know the word "libertarian" until sometime during college. It's a pretty good characterization. I've long been offended by the economics of liberals and the "we know best" agendas of conservatives. (Obviously, I am generalizing here.) I have long been annoyed, in particular, by the agenda of liberals on "social issues" like welfare and social security. I believe that as far as governments are concerned, this is a purely private matter. Voluntary charity, not coerced taxes, should fund programs for the poor, and each person should be responsible for his own retirement planning (and will likely do a better job of managing such funds, because it's in his best interest).
"why can't I be like other people?"
Do you believe that what you see of someone else is the entirety of that person? Most of us hide the bad stuff inside, so you see only the better qualities in other people and everything in yourself. You're not getting a balanced view.
If you don't like something about yourself, examine it and figure out a plan of attack. But don't do it because you think you're not as "good" as other people, because, as I said, your view of other people is flawed. And don't do it because it's what you think others expect. The only changes that ever stick are the ones that you are motivated to make for selfish reasons. Yes, selfish, as in "I'm doing this for me", not "I'm doing this so so-and-so will like me" or "I'm doing this because my doctor says I should" or "I'm doing this because I'll go to hell if I don't".
Several years ago I decided that I needed to work on compassion and consideration and seeing the other side of a conflict and stuff like that (broadly, the "judge others favorably" category). I think I've done pretty well with this (yes, of course I've had slip-ups; who hasn't?), and now frequently look for favorable explanations for what looks like bad behavior. (Yeah, sometimes people are just jerks and you can't whitewash it, but more often there's a legitimate misunderstanding.) Tackling this may have been my greatest personal accomplishment of the last decade, and it couldn't happen until I decided it was important.
(no subject)
Yes, I was. I left in 1988.
Ok, how many of you still clearly remember the people you worked with in 1988 (you young'ns can skip this question), especially those who were *not* your day-to-day coworkers? I mean, it's not like Robin was another engineer I worked with all the time; she was probably one of the accountants or something. I don't remember.
I've always been bad with names and faces, but somehow I don't think this one reflects that badly on me. :-)