cellio: (Default)
2002-01-30 01:45 pm
Entry tags:

new spam trend?

At least half the spam I've gotten in the last few weeks has started off with "Here are the results of your feedback form" or some such. It's one slime level more advanced than "in response to your query" (which, of course, I never sent). So far, all of these messages seem to be advertising porn. Whee.
cellio: (Default)
2002-01-22 08:49 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

The not-for-profit outfits seem to be entering the world of spammers. I think this is unwise. So far, in the past week, I have told two that I regularly support (to a small degree), and who sent me multiple unsolicited electronic "newsletters", that they would no longer be receiving my dollars and they may as well take me off their paper mailing lists too. Now, as I have never given either of these outfits my email address, I must conclude that they are spamming in general rather than sending newsletters out to their actual supporters -- which would itself be unreasonable unless said supporters signed up for that.

I see this as very different from places where I'm already on the mailing list for content and occasionally they ask for money. I don't have a problem with them using their usual means of talking to me to ask for support.
cellio: (Default)
2001-11-02 04:46 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Memo to self: on Tuesday, I have to remember to vote against Kate <somebody> (somewhat illegible; hope it's unambiguous) for judge. I don't know how qualified she is, but she or her minions engage in phone-spam, and that's enough for me. It's one thing to have your people make calls; it's another to have your machine make calls and fail to detect answering machines. My machine cut it off after 3 minutes, but I still had to wait through it to get to the second message -- which then turned out to be a wrong number. Grr.

(Yeah, I know I can get a better machine, but that's fundamentally the same argument as "use your delete key". It's a coping mechanism, not a justification of bad behavior.)
cellio: (Default)
2001-11-02 01:44 pm
Entry tags:

spam

This is a new one on me. I just got spam (that bypassed the pobox spam-rating system with narry a blip) from someone selling diapers and other baby-related stuff. That's just as far off the mark as the spam I get telling me I can enlarge my penis.

But it gets better. You see, she's not actually advertising a brand of diapers. She says that if I send her $3 she'll tell me the *name* of this amazing brand of diapers (and also the name of an amazing brand of formula, and some other junk). So it's spam advertising ads!

The mind boggles.

(Oh, and send cash or make checks out to "cash"; there's no actual name...)
cellio: (Default)
2001-09-18 10:48 pm
Entry tags:

a useful service

You know what would be a really useful service for someone on the net to supply? I want someone to generate fake bounce messages for me. Specifically, I want to be able to feed spam in and have the spammer get a "message undeliverable; bogus address" bounce back. Yeah, most spammers pipe the return mail to /dev/null, but some actually seem to be more persistent. I'm getting daily spam from one particular loser right now, and I'd like to make it stop.
cellio: (Default)
2001-09-11 11:26 pm
Entry tags:

spam with a conscience?

I just got email from "Network Commerce" (clearly a spammer from general message properties) urging me to give blood. I don't know whether to be annoyed because it's spam or encouraged that even spammers might have hearts. Well, whatever.