My synagogue has each grade-school class run one service a year.
This has been frustrating for me for a variety of reasons, but
this year they made a change. Fourth and fifth grades are
now having their services at the monthly "family" Shabbat
service, rather than the primary congregational service, and
all classes are being split into two services. (Some classes
have 50+ kids, and that was just too crazy.)
Last night was the first of these modified services, and it
went very well. It was much less chaotic, the kids got to
do more, and it was more of a service than a pageant for the
parents. And the younger grades, which are more problematic,
are doing their services in a more supportive (for them)
and less annoying (for the rest of us) environment. It's
a win all around, I think.
When there's a bar or bat mitzvah (which is almost every
week), that person participates a bit in the Friday service
(kiddush and v'shamru). The girl who was bat mitzvah this
Shabbat is really good -- good Hebrew pronunciation,
good singing voice, and, most importantly, good kavanah.
She seemed to really connect with the words she was saying;
she was leading, not just performing. At the oneg I told
her how impressed I am and that I hope she'll continue to
be involved -- confirmation, youth group, etc.
This morning's service went well. For the second week in a
row I successfully wound the torah scroll to the right point
before the service; I'll learn my way around yet. :-)
(Usually the rabbi does it, but both times I was there
first and I guess I'm sort of the quasi-gabbai or something
now, so I took a crack at it.)
Three of our upcoming Torah readers specifically signed up
for their own bar/bat-mitzvah portions. Two are students
(so this was fairly recent). None of them have committed
to doing more than the one portion, but I hope at least
some of them decide to stick with it. Right now I've got
five people (including myself) who are "regulars", and
several people who are doing it once and then will decide.
(I'm not counting the rabbi, who reads in weeks without
b'nei mitzvah. I think there are four of those in the
next six months.) I'd like to have about eight regulars.
On my way to services Friday I ran into someone on the
street who said "hey, aren't you a cantor at [congregation]?"
I said I had led services there occasionally but now they've
hired a professional (who, I said, is good), and he said
flattering things about my work. That was pleasant. (He
doesn't belong there either and goes only occasionally, but
seems to have hit several of my services purely by
accident.)
I've been reading a book called The Kiruv Files,
about Jewish outreach. More about that later, but one
observation now: one of us, either I or the Orthodox
rabbis who wrote it, has a fundamental misunderstanding
of Reform Judaism. The book takes a few swipes at
Reform, predicated on the assumption that "all halacha
is optional for you guys" (so therefore you can change
the rules to suit your whims). Um, no. That Reform
does not accept the system of halacha handed down
to us, wholesale, and that Reform insists on personal
autonomy, does not mean that we get to ignore
it all. Many Jews do, of course (and not all of them
call themselves Reform), but serious Reform
Jews can and do accept some halachot as binding --
just as binding as traditional Jews do. This is why
I do not work on Shabbat, why I keep kosher, why I
pray in certain ways, and why I do or don't do bunches
of other stuff. The problem, to the outsider, is
that a different Reform Jew will have a different
set of binding halachot.
Thursday night's board meeting included the quarterly
financial review (budget vs actuals). The reports are
getting clearer, in part due to requests from me. :-)
And I see that a couple of our newer board members are
very concientious (and nit-picky) in reviewing these
things, which makes me happy. I'm in my last year;
someone else has to be as anal-retentive for me, for
continuity. :-) (I'm also on the nominating committee
for the next round of board members, which should be
interesting. That was announced Thursday.)
Tuesday
lyev and I had a small dance workshop
(no one else could make it) in which we reconstructed
Belfiore (15th-century Italian) from first principles.
It turns out that there is one ambiguity that I hadn't
remembered from the last time I looked at this (with
Rosina): do the three dancers start side-by-side, like
in Petit Vriens, or in a single-file line? We had
assumed the former, but one of the figures is difficult
that way and there are references in the text to dancers
"above" and "below" others (where we are not talking about
vertical displacement with respect to the floor). We
only had two dancers so couldn't try a complete implementation,
but I can see the single-file line working. Eventually
we'll be able to give it a shot, or
lyev
will get the Thursday dancers to try it. And I should
check our notes from Joy and Jealousy now; I
didn't want to do that before because it's actually been
long enough that I've forgotten and this way I could come
to it without (obvious) preconceptions.
Tonight we went to a restaurant that was so
dimly lit that I actually had to take the menu to the
front (lobby) area so I could read it. Argh! I'm
not surprised by dim light from fancy and/or
pretentious restaurants, where I guess the assumption
is that you don't need to see your food and candles
are romantic, but -- Outback? C'mon! I
guess I should be on the lookout for a flashlight
small enough to carry in a pocket; I think they make
such things targetted for shining a light on your
door locks at night; I would imagine that's designed
to be fairly small.