cellio: (star)
In response to my last entry, I've received a few questions:

Do you think it constitutes observance to sing Christian music? If so, how do you feel about Christians singing/playing music of the Judaic tradition?

Also, at what point did you start feeling uncomfortable about singing Christian music? Did you ever discuss this with your rabbi?

These questions deserve an answer that isn't buried in comments. (And anyway, it may get too long for that. Err, who am I kidding -- it will get too long for that. :-) )

Read more... )

cellio: (moon)
I think I've now gotten questions to everyone who's asked for some so far. Please let me know if I'm wrong about that.

death, Catholicism, SCA, meeting people, job )

Here's how it works:

  1. If you want to be interviewed, leave a comment saying so.
  2. I will respond, asking you five questions.
  3. You'll update your journal with my five questions and your five answers.
  4. You'll include this explanation.
  5. You'll ask other people five questions when they want to be interviewed.

cellio: (mars)
Hey look -- the interview meme is back. :-)

life update, On the Mark, SCA topics )

  1. If you want to be interviewed, leave a comment saying so.
  2. I will respond, asking you five questions.
  3. You'll update your journal with my five questions and your five answers.
  4. You'll include this explanation.
  5. You'll ask other people five questions when they want to be interviewed.

cellio: (palestrina)
Friday night at services someone asked me if I would join him Monday night for a chamber-music concert. (He'd been given two tickets and his wife wasn't able to make it.) I enjoy string quartets, so I said sure.

review )

One thing that surprised me is how seldom the musicians turned pages in the music. For the most part, they were doing entire movements without page turns. Now granted, each musician probably has only his part, and the stand can accommodate three pages (though most of the music was in two-page spreads, at least in the viola player's music, the only music I could look right down on), but still. It's got to be pretty densely packed, assuming there's not serious memorization happening. And the musicians were moving around a fair bit (swaying, I mean, not getting up and dancing :-) ), so it couldn't have been written too small or they wouldn't have been able to see it.

I was a little surprised by the length of the concert. As I said, I don't know much about classical music, so I went in thinking "how long can a string quartet be? 20 minutes?" The Mendelssohn was about 35 minutes (if the concert started on time, and it was close); I didn't note times on the other two. The concert ran about 2:10 including the intermission (and the intermission wasn't that long). So much for my prediction to Dani that I'd probably be done about the same time he was done with choir practice. :-)

cellio: (dulcimer)
[livejournal.com profile] ohiblather asked how people feel about instrumental music (playing or listening). (Yes, voice is an instrument too, and probably my best, but that's not the focus here.) Sure, get me going. :-)

I enjoy playing instrumental music, and have composed some and arranged a bunch more. My primary instrument is hammer dulcimer, with which I'm competent. But what I lack in skill I try to make up for in spirit. :-)

For listening, it depends on context. For "attentive listening", such as at a performance, I connect best if I can perceive that the musicians are connecting with it. A great example of this is Homespun Celeidh Band, [livejournal.com profile] dglenn's group, but performers don't have to be as physically active as they are to convey that they are into the music, either. I also enjoy music where the sheer intensity comes through, which requires a different performance style. Either way, though, I find it harder to perceive this connection between the performer and the music (even though it may well be there) in larger groups, like orchestras, so I don't generally enjoy performances of classical music. As background music to listen to on a CD, though, I do enjoy it.

And against all my predictions based on the preceeding, I find that I enjoy some modern electronic music even if, for all I know, it's purely computer-programmed or something. I enjoy the works of Christopher Franke, for example, though I have no clue how he produces them. Every now and then I noodle around with my computer in that musical space, but I don't know what I'm doing and I've never produced anything worth preserving.

When On the Mark started we were uncertain if people would sit still for instrumental music at performances, particularly at cons. (In the SCA, sure (somewhat). Cons? Not so much.) We tend to be fairly conservative -- one instrumental piece for about every 3-4 songs, and songs are on average a little longer. We've gotten mixed responses, but some people very much enjoy the instrumental music. I think mixing instrumental and vocal pieces in a concert (or on a recording) works best if your vocal pieces tend to also have rich instrumentation, so it's not as much of a change. We strive for that -- don't always succeed, but we try. This means we're doing less with vocal harmonies because people are busy playing instruments, though, so there are definitely trade-offs.

cellio: (garlic)
The pot-luck invitation calls for dishes based on song lyrics. I wanted to make something parve (neither meat nor dairy), to keep my options open.

Carrot Juice is Murder (also known as "Screams of the Vegetables") by the Arrogant Worms seemed to be just the thing. Excerpt:

I've heard the screams of the vegetables (scream scream scream)
Watching their skins being peeled (having their insides revealed)
Grated and steamed with no mercy (burning off calories)
How do you think that feels (bet it hurts really bad)
Carrot juice constitutes murder (and that's a real crime)
Greenhouses prisons for slaves (let my vegetables grow)
It's time to stop all this gardening (it's dirty as hell)
Let's call a spade a spade (it's a spade it's a spade it's a spade)

implementation )

Shabbat

Jul. 31st, 2004 11:26 pm
cellio: (shira)
Shabbat went pretty well. Friday night my committee led services; I did most of the music, and we had several readers (one per section of the service), lay torah readers (two), and a sermon by a lay member. All of them did good jobs, and I think most of them enjoyed it. Walter, another member of the committee, sang the opening song and the anthem (the latter goes after the sermon). He has a wonderful voice and is a good orator (with speech and song).

My music mostly went well, and I received many compliments. Our cantorial soloist was there (with her two-week-old child), and she complimented me too. That felt nice! There were some glitches, all of which can be chalked up to "Monica is not used to working with an accompanist", and sadly, some of them were obvious to the congregation. One was not, because the aforementioned accompanist is very good. (There are a bunch of different settings of one song out there, and we had discussed which one to do. He played an intro that sounded to me like one of the others, I concluded that he had goofed and started to sing that one, and he concluded that I had goofed and followed me -- without music in front of him and while tranposing into a different key. As it turns out, the intros really are that similar but we hadn't noticed.)

The committee as a whole received a bunch of compliments; we were widely perceived as relaxed, comfortable, and competent, and a couple people told me they found the service to be moving because the leaders were obviously engaged -- praying and not just reciting. I hope some of them tell these things to the rabbi. :-)

My rabbi had asked me to lead torah study Saturday morning with some materials he had prepared, so I got an advance copy to review and scribble on. (I was trying to plan the conversation -- where to pause for discussion, what points to try to tease out of the group, and so on.) We usually have 10-20 people for study; today we had four. I expected the group to be smaller, but not that much smaller. Fortunately, the other three participated rather than just sitting and listening, and they were generally supportive, and things went fine.

The low turnout was foreshadowing, alas. This is only the second time I have seen this group not get a minyan. (The other time was on a cold, snowy winter day with hazardous roads.) We had eight people. I did a good job of leading the service, I think (many of the people who showed up thanked me later). We couldn't read torah without a minyan, but the two people who had prepared the portion (the same ones who read Friday night -- re-use is good) read it out of a chumash (that's allowed) and led a discussion of the parsha, which most people participated in. So that worked out. We read haftarah without the blessing, which I think was correct. (Reading it is fine, as reading the torah text was fine. What I'm not sure of is whether the blessing requires a minyan, so I erred on the side of caution, and for parity with the torah reading.)

Noted in passing: there is one prayer (kedusha) where if you don't have a minyan you say a different version. (Other things you just omit in the absence of a minyan.) Our siddur doesn't have the alternate text; it assumes a minyan. It turns out I have it memorized, though, so no biggie.

There are a few reasons for the low turnout. A lot of people are out of town for various reasons; I knew that. Attendance is always a little lower (but still higher than this!) when it is known that my rabbi won't be there but the associate rabbi will. (My rabbi built this service and is very strongly connected with it.) It's clear, though, that at least some people who will come for the associate rabbi won't come for a layperson, even a layperson who is a regular who knows the service inside and out. That attitude could be a hurdle if we try to increase lay involvement in our services more generally -- it's the whole "no one but the rabbi is good enough" problem. We need to figure out how widespread that attitude is and what to do about it.

cellio: (dulcimer ((C) Debbie Ohi))
A couple of the classes during the Sh'liach K'hilah program were taught by a cantorial student (who is very good, by the way, both as a musician and as a teacher). I mentioned some of this briefly before, but now I'm going into a little more depth.

Early in one of the classes he asked us to brainstorm about things to consider when choosing music for a service. Here's the list we came up with:Read more... )

He handed out an essay entitled some notes on the future of of Jewish sacred music (yay Google!) by Cantor Benjie-Ellen Schiller. (Aside: we had her as a visiting cantor one Shabbat several years ago, and she's great to work with.) Despite its vague title the essay is good. Excerpt:

Sacred music nurtures meaningful, honest prayer, whether or not the music we ultimately choose satisfies our artistic selves. The real test is whether our sacred music satisfies our spiritual selves, as individuals and as a community. To me, a successful service offers a healthy combination of all three moods of prayer to express an array of three paths toward knowing God.
(Gee, you think there's some debate within the cantorial community? :-) )

Cantor Schiller describes four types of music (three in this essay, one added later):

  • majestic, expressing awe
  • meditation, expressing intimacy
  • "meeting" -- coming together as a community (like when we all sing familiar melodies together)
  • memory, instantly taking you to another place and time
As you might expect, it's all about balance and appropriateness, matching up the music with the goals of the service -- or rather, that part of the service, because most services will contain most or all of these types of music. We expect Kedusha, the proclamation of God's holiness, to be majestic, so don't use a wimpy low-key melody there. We expect the beginning of the Amidah to be meditative, so that's not the time to be grandiose. We expect everyone to join in on Adon Olam at the end of the service, so choose an accessible tune.

Leigh (the instructor) gave us his "10 commandments of congregational singing", which I enjoyed. (These are for the congregation, not the cantor.) I haven't asked for permission to distribute the document, but here are some highlights:

  • Thou shalt sing fearlessly, ignoring the possible wondering glances of thy neighbors. They would like to sing with you if they had the nerve and they will sing with joy if you continue.
  • Thou shalt sing reverently, for music is prayer.
  • Thou shalt not resist new melodies, for it is written in the book of Psalms, "Sing unto God a new song".
All food for thought as I prepare to lead music this Friday. A lot of the music decisions were made several weeks ago, but my goal was to keep it simple and familiar, and I did have some of these instincts already, so we'll be fine.

cellio: (dulcimer ((C) Debbie Ohi))
(For those who've asked, "random bits" are longer than "short takes".)

Last night I adapted a piece of music for (folk) harp for the first time. Mind, I don't play harp -- but I've been around those who have enough to have some basic clues, so when a friend asked me if I could render a four-part a-capella piece for harp and singer for her wedding, I agreed to give it a shot. It was an interesting exercise; harp is kind of like piano in terms of how you think about the hands, but has the twist of also having to plan for when to flip the sharping levers for accidentals. (Doing so requires that you take one hand off the strings, so right after a long note is a good time to do this.)

After I completed my first draft I talked with the harpist. She says she doesn't have sharping levers. Oops; how did I miss that? So I'll see if I can arrange around them. At which point we move from "music that is a subset of the original" to "music that is slightly different from the original". Fortunately, it's rennaissance music and I know how not to do anything egregious there. Still, it's a fun challenge.


One of my cats (Baldur) has taken to meowing persistently in the early mornings (around 6am), almost every day, for minutes at a time. He's 11 years old and this is a recent change (last couple months). I have been unable to correlate it with anything else going on in the house. His last physical was in January and he was fine, and he doesn't do this at other times. Do the kitty psychologists in my reading audience have any theories?

Today my shell-account provider had a scheduled OS upgrade. When they came back online, SSH was behaving oddly for me. It told me the host key had changed (not surprising), and I chose the "accept for this session only" option. (Hey, I'm paranoid -- even though I know that should be ok, I want to see the right things happen before making the permanent change.) At that point SSH bounced me on a permission error (I never got to the password) -- repeatedly. On a whim, I said to just accept the key -- and everything was fine. What the heck? Now that I think about it, though, I'm pretty sure the same thing happened to me a few years ago -- so maybe if I write it down this time I'll actually remember next time.

Asian restaurants tend toward the "spiciness on a scale of 1 to 10" meme. Of course, one restaurant's "7" might not resemble another one's "7" -- or even its own on a different day. But there's a bigger issue: is this supposed to depend on the dish you order? What does it mean to order Moo Goo Gai Pan to a spiciness of 9, or Kung Pao Chicken to a spiciness of 1? If you do that, does the cook just shrug and make the dish normally, or what? (Mind, I have little personal experience with numbers in the bottom two-thirds of the scale...) This thought brought to you by the data-collection effort going on at my place of employment to attempt to determine the pattern, if any, of spice levels at the nearby Thai restaurant.

I enjoyed this entry on the dynamics of ladies' nights at bars.

Why can't people who use auto-reply systems when they're on vacation learn to configure them to not send such messages to posters on mailing lists? Sheesh. For mail that was sent directly to you, go wild -- but if I post to a mailing list with several hundred subscribers, I really don't need to be told about the ten specific subscribers who are on vacation this week.

Shabbat

May. 9th, 2004 05:24 pm
cellio: (shira)
Friday's musical service went well. It looked like we had at least 300 people there (maybe 350 or 400), which is a lot more than normal. The congregational choir sang, which was nice, and some other cantorial members of the cantor's family were there too. Fun night!

I had an interesting conversation with our cantor about the service (or services?) the worship commitee will need to lead this summer. She expects to be out on maternity leave then, so she said she's working on lining up substitutes. We talked about stage-management issues when none of the people on the bima are regulars, and while I don't remember how we got there, I ended up saying (in an appropriate context) that there are certainly members of the worship committee who could competently fill that role for one week, and she said she really wished we'd volunteer in that case, and I said "ok, then I'm volunteering". (I also said I'm not the only one who could, though I of course don't know who else would.) Dunno where it will go (if it does); she and the rabbi will need to have a talk. I had previously made such a comment to the rabbi (during the last cantor's maternity leave), and it went nowhere. But maybe that cantor wasn't on board with the idea. I have been trying very hard to avoid stepping on any toes; music at services is her domain and I don't want her (or the rabbi) to perceive me as pushy. On the other hand, I'd much rather have one of us than an outside singer who might or might not even be Jewish, and she agrees with me on non-Jews, so we'll see. (I think the previous cantor was more interested in having a good singer than in having a Jew. I personally don't think we should have non-Jews leading any part of services, and the congregation has gotten better about that, but we're not completely there yet.)

Saturday morning had one bit of frustration, and I have to have a conversation I'm not looking forward to. During the service we go around the circle so people can say the names of people they're saying kaddish for, and recently we've started to also go around saying names before saying the prayer for healing. One of the people there (who used to be a regular, then disappeared for most of a year, then started showing up again a few weeks ago) treated this as a bit of a political soapbox, saying he wanted to add the names of all the Iraqi prisoners to the list. Saying that much would have been fine; going from there into a rant about the despicable behavior of the people responsible, on the other hand, was inappropriate. I don't disagree that the assessment of the behavior, but the healing portion of a Shabbat service is not the time and place for political diatribes. He should have saved it for the informal conversation afterwards. (It doesn't help that this particular individual, err, really likes to hear himself talk, so he is never brief and on-point.) So I was annoyed (but not fast enough to stop it on the spot), and I could tell some others were annoyed, and I've received one email complaint already. (It's not really my minyan, but people see it as mine when the rabbi isn't there.) I'm tempted to send him email, which will allow me to choose my words carefully without having to interact with him in real time, but calling is probably the correct thing to do.

After services we headed to Johan and Arianna's for a meeting of the Pennsic camp. (This was mostly to decide if we need to make any infrastructure changes this year and to decide what projects to tackle. This year we're going to try for some box benches, to solve both seating and stuff-containment problems.) It seems we don't see each other as frequently as we used to, now that two are no longer coworkers and one has dropped out of the choir and so on, so it was nice to see everyone and just hang out. (Well, not everyone; the out-of-town contingent didn't make it in.)

cellio: (galaxy)
1. How did you get into SF fandom? Read more... )

2. What made you decide to convert to Judaism? Read more... )

3. What made you decide to keep Kosher?Read more... )

4. When you're not listening to filk, what kinds of music do you listen to?Read more... )

5. If you were stranded on a desert island with only the essentials and were told you could only have one musical instrument or device, what would that be, and why? Read more... )

cellio: (mandelbrot)
Yesterday I heard two songs (one from a psalm) from a group with the unlikely name "Ooolites" (or perhaps technically "Malcolm Dalglish and the..."). Very skilled singers (no vibrato! do you know how hard that is?!), nice harmonies, pleasant sound. They seem to have two albums. I don't know how representative these two tracks are of the albums, but I think I'm going to have to find out.

From Slashdot by way of [livejournal.com profile] siderea: the "why your anti-spam proposal won't work" form letter.

At last night's board meeting I had a wording quibble (a matter of precision and clarity) over a proposed bylaws change. One of the other board members suggested that I was being overly picky because I'm a technical writer. Hello? This is a matter of law. Law should be precise and clear. I happen to be in a profession that emphasizes that; this is an asset. (We have a couple lawyers on the board; I'm surprised one of them didn't speak up.) Sheesh -- amateurs. :-)

Speaking of law, I'm reading from Mishpatim tomorrow morning -- the "eye for eye, tooth for tooth" section. We are used to thinking of this as being harsh (sharia, anyone? no thanks), which is why the rabbis reinterpreted it to monetary damages. But with that interpretation, I wonder if this is actually lenient. Consider civil damages today in the US, where payments sometimes seem to be way out of proportion to actual damage, and are wildly inconsistent. And we distinguish based on who the victim is; the torah does not.

Twice within the past couple weeks I've been approached by people on the streets selling raffle tickets. Both conversations began with "would you like to buy a raffle ticket?" and "what for?"; then they diverged. One said "for Hillel Academy"; the other said "for a $5000 drawing". (The latter was from a veterans' group.) I knew intellectually that Judaism (and hence, Jewish culture) approaches charity differently from the world at large (or at least its US instantiation), but it's been a while since the difference has been that obvious. In the Jewish world (at least the parts I've seen), the cause is the important thing. In fact, the word usually translated as "charity" -- "tzedakah" -- doesn't really mean that; it's closer to "justice". I actually haven't even looked to see what the prize is for the Hillel raffle ticket I bought. In the broader culture, though, you have to sell the prize; it's assumed, I guess, that people won't just buy a ticket to support a good cause and you have to make it worth their while. Which partially explains the deluge of mailing labels, calendars, stuffed animals, umbrellas, and such that appear in my mailbox (and serve as anti-motivators).

I particularly like this take on the rainbow meme, shamelessly stolen from [livejournal.com profile] xiphias:

           
My God says "Justice, justice shall you pursue", wants people to work toward a fair and equitable world, and believes in love, honor, and respect. Sorry about yours.

cellio: (Monica-old)
1. Why did you pick the hammer dulcimer? Read more... )

2. What foods, if any, do you particularly miss from your pre-kosher days? Read more... )

3. What's the scariest experience you're willing to talk about in this forum? Read more... )

4. What technological advance do you most look forward to in the next ten to twenty years? Read more... )

5. I'll return the question, but more broadly: what would you like to get in your next RPG experience? This might include whether you'd be a player or GM, ruleset, genre, tone, character type, whatever. Read more... )

cellio: (moon-shadow)
Friday night I met Malcolm Dalglish. Neat! (His neice was being bat mitzvah this Shabbat at my synagogue.) Malcolm Dalglish is a very good hammer-dulcimer player, one of several whose recordings I listened to a lot when I was starting to play. I've never seen him in concert and had completely lost track of him, and then my rabbi happened to mention his name in passing at services and my ears perked up. So I tried not to be a fangirl. :-)

Speaking of music, what is the shared musical property that many Yiddish songs have? This is probably really "many songs from such-and-such time and location", but I don't know the genre. But there's something -- a mode, a melobdic pattern, a chord structure, or something -- that allowed me to correctly predict that the song the cantor was about to sing would be in Yiddish, based only on the piano intro. And the song really did sound like the Yiddish songs Dani's mother likes to listen to (those are probably mostly from Russia), though it was not one I recognized. I just lack the sample size to put my finger on what that similarity is. (I don't actually like a lot of this music, so my curiosity will not be satisfied by accumulating a large sample size. :-) )

Saturday morning's ice-breaker question was interesting (though we were trying to keep answers short due to time). Every morning we thank God for making us free. (Orthodox Jews thank God for making us not slaves, instead.) So, looking ahead to 2004, are we more looking forward to "freedom to" or "freedom from" something? (Naming the something was optional.)

I live a pretty privileged life. I have plenty to eat and wear; I have a good job; I have a comfortable home; I have good friends and family; there is nothing that I truly need but lack. So my thoughts turned immediately to "freedom to". Nothing specific came to mind, actually -- I hope to pretty much keep doing the things I've been doing. I have no major changes queued up.

There is one area of concern, though; I hope for freedom from the big-brother government that things like the Patriot act enable. (Were you paying attention? Did you notice that many provisions of Patriot II are now law, and that the FBI can now secretly snoop on you through your bank, credit-card company, stock broker, and even jeweler? What's next, monitoring grocery purchases?) I think our civil liberties are probably at their greatest risk since the McCarthy era. I wish I'd had the presence of mind to say something yesterday; it might have gotten a few more people thinking about it.

cellio: (shira)
Our choir is going to be doing a Salamone Rossi piece ("Hashkiveinu"). I have a modern edition of the music, but it has some problems:

  • It's a French edition. Hebrew transliterated into French vowels is not very intuitive for our English-speaking choir.
  • There are several errors in the transliteration.
  • It's somewhat below the norms of legibility to which we have become accustomed.
So I've re-typeset the piece, but I don't have access to a facsimile of Rossi's manuscript. I'm using the modern edition as my primary guide, and consulting siddurim and a dictionary to resolve the occasional text question. (This process was greatly aided by [livejournal.com profile] lefkowitzga, who is rather more fluent in Hebrew than I am.)

I have one issue remaining. There is a place where the French edition says "ushvor satan mil'faneinu" [1]. "Ushvor" is in the verb position; the rest of the phrase is (loosely) "...impediment [or temptation] from before us". So you would expect a word like "remove".

"Ushvor" isn't a word, near as we can tell. The word "ushmor" is "guard"; if that's the intended word, then there's a word missing or something, because "guard impediment from before us" doesn't make sense. The siddur uses the word "[v']haseir", which does in fact mean "remove".

So I have three choices: (1) assume that "ushvor" really is what Rossi wrote and I just don't know what he meant; (2) assume the French transcriber made a one-character mistake, but with a word that doesn't really fit; or (3) assume that the transcriber just wrote the wrong word somehow and that Rossi really wrote "haseir".

I guess I will do what any good academic would do: choose my favorite (#3), and footnote it.

I'd love to find a facsimile of Rossi's manuscript! Failing that, I'd love to find a 16th-century Italian siddur, to at least see what text was commonly in use in his time. So far, though, I haven't been able to turn up either through the library.

[1] Actually, it says "...mil'fanecha" (from before you). This is one of those errors I was referring to.

cellio: (lilac)
A friend recently asked what musical instruments I play (and how well). In writing the answer, I realized something about how my brain is (or isn't) wired for playing music.

I play hammer dulcimer (well), bodhran (competently), hand drums/tambourines/etc (minimally), and bowed psaltry (basically competent). I had several years of piano lessons as a child, but can't do anything more than very basic stuff now (oops). I used to play appalachian dulcimer a little, but haven't in years. I've played around with harps a little bit, but never learned to play.

I tried to learn folk guitar when I was in high school, but my fingers were too short to chord correctly. (They probably still are, though back then I didn't know that there were guitars with narrow necks for people like me.) I also had trouble wrapping my brain around this "non-linear" instrument; at that point the only instrument I had played was piano, where the notes were nicely in a row from lowest to highest. Of course that's true on a fret board as well, but the parallelism of doing it six times with offsets confused me. Still does, somewhat, though I've played really simple bass lines (electric bass) on a couple songs that On the Mark does. Really simple, though. And I memorized the relevant fret/string positions; if you asked me to find a particular note (that's not an open string) I would have to stop and compute. That gets better with practice, of course, but I find it challenging.

I have played around with recorders a bit, but haven't put the time in to actually achieve competence. I find learning the fingerings to be hard.

The conclusion I draw from all of this is that while I am good with timing and rhythm, I am not so good with fingerings, especially if I have to move several fingers at once in order to change pitch. I think of music "horizontally", not "vertically", and I think of notes as single things that you do, not aggregates of multiple actions. (This horizontal/vertical thing applies to singing, too. I can sing arbitrarily-complex counterpoint, and stand a decent chance of sight-reading it not too badly, but close harmony drives me batty as a singer, as does your stereotypical randomly-jumping-around alto line.) Obviously I can play instruments that use all the fingers, as I was competent on piano lo these many years ago, but I suspect the linear nature of the instrument makes a big difference for me.

If all of this is true, then it should be a predictor of other instruments that would be good, or bad, for me to try. It's a pity that cello or viola da gamba is probably on the "bad" side of that evaluation; I love the sound of deep, rich, bowed strings.

cellio: (wedding)
I am currently listening to the new CD re-issue of Julia Ecklar's "Divine Intervention", which came in today's mail. Wow!

DI was a cassette that was published back in 1986. I bought it, of course -- I was buying lots of filk, and I loved Julia's voice. And this album was like nothing I had ever heard in fandom before. Filk was about voice (not always high-quality) and guitar, and maybe the occasional cough from the audience (most of what I had was live recordings, from cons). The first filk I bought was probably "Minus Ten and Counting", so I knew that studio recordings did sometimes happen. They weren't up to the level of "professional" studio recordings; filk tapes sold a few hundred copies, so who could afford that?

But someone raised money to produce a "real" tape -- with a kick-butt engineer, orchestral musicians, stunning arrangements (sometimes overdone), and Julia's voice. It was a wonderful, ground-breaking recording (with no real followers, though).

But cassettes rot over time, and it's been out of print for years. Fairly early on I made myself a copy and played that into the ground, so my cassette is probably in ok shape today -- aside from being 16 years old. I mean, it's not like I had the forethought to really protect it or anything.

But now, Eli Goldberg has worked miracles and it's out on CD. The notes in the booklet suggest that a fair amount of digital excavation was involved; he had an analog tape master to work with, and first he had to clean the mold off of it. The resulting CD is very pleasant, and far ahead of what the cassette could do. (And I see that there are bonus tracks, newly-recorded, coming up in a few minutes.)

So Eli, when are Julia and Mike and the gang going to do a new album? If this is what 16-year-old salvage can sound like, I can't wait for new material. :-)

More info: http://www.prometheus-music.com .

short takes

Dec. 6th, 2002 02:36 pm
cellio: (tulips)
My car suffers from a seasonal disorder. I suppose a 14-year-old car is allowed to have senior moments, but it's still inconvenient. In cold weather, the hatch will not stay up under its own power. This made unloading groceries last night challenging. This is definitely about cold and not snow. I don't know what causes it; it's been happening for a few years. Maybe I should rig some sort of prop to use in the garage; Marion used a broom to hold up the door of her minivan when it had a similar problem.

My copy of "Divine Intervention" on CD just shipped. Yay! This is a high-quality filk album, by Julia Ecklar, that was released on cassette more than 15 years ago, but is only now coming out on CD, remastered and everything. I'm looking forward to hearing it.

I need a copy of a soon-to-be-released DVD (for a gift), and the release date is only a few days before I'll need it. I don't want to rely on a mail-order place to get it to me in time, especially in December. Is there some place in Pittsburgh where I can count on getting it, ideally by pre-ordering and then picking it up on the release day? I am unschooled in the ways of shopping for current hot items. :-)

Tomorrow night is the company party. One of my co-workers is taking advanced Hebrew classes, and she knows my husband is an Israeli, so she asked if he would be there and said she's always looking for people she can converse with. I wonder if I should warn him. :-) (He was fluent at one time, but hasn't used it regularly since childhood.)

Tonight: last night of Chanukah. The fully-loaded chanukiah (aka menorah) lends a very nice, warm glow to the dining room when the rest of the lights are out. This year I am using the chanukiah that was a gift from my parents several years ago. (We have several -- I owned two and then we got two as wedding presents -- so I've been informally rotating.)

next round

Sep. 26th, 2002 10:07 am
cellio: (mandelbrot)
[livejournal.com profile] amergina: Yes, somewhat, though it's hard to characterize. In some areas (sometimes loosely called "social justice") the trend has been slightly more liberal/compassionate; in other areas there has been no change despite prevailing opinions in the community; and in other cases complete disinterest has turned into interest. But this question both requires and deserves a much better answer than that, so I will endeavor to address this separately within the next week.

[livejournal.com profile] celebrin: For the first part, I think you must have me confused with someone else, and I'm sorry that I don't know how to help you. For the second part: to use the tools we are given to the best of our ability and for good.

[livejournal.com profile] steven: It's taken a while, and it's not a solitary process. Grounding in meaningful ethical sources (regardless of where they come from) is essential. Succinct guiding principles don't hurt either: "What is hateful to you, do not do to others. That is the whole law; all the rest is commentary. Go and study." (Oh, and thank you.)

[livejournal.com profile] alienor: Like the musical instrument with one more syllable ("ee"), emphasis on the first syllable.

[livejournal.com profile] dvarin: Accessories: currently Encore, a generic computer, and generic speakers for playback. Previously, staff paper, a pencil, and a piano. Processes: If I'm starting from scratch, start by drafting a melody -- which usually takes life with singing, not with noodling around on an instrument -- and then add a bass line, tweaking both as necessary to make them happy together. Then I fill in other parts (simultaneously) to complement. Alternatively, I enjoy imitative counterpoint and sometimes compose an entire piece in parallel, a few measures at a time, but this is both harder and less in demand so it's not the norm. Mostly I do renaissance-style dance music, but also arrange some stuff for my folk-music group and the very occasional "art" piece just for the fun of it. These last were mostly a product of one semester of private composition lessons, though I'm going to try to retrofit a Psalm setting I once did in Latin into Hebrew and then give it to our cantor for evaluation. I have never done anything symphonic, and rarely done scoring for specific instruments.

[livejournal.com profile] ksnell: It's the way I learned the meme; I didn't think much about it. Having promised that kind of privacy I can't change it now, though if I ever do this again perhaps I'll do it differently. Writing the answers to imply but not outright state the questions has been interesting, and maybe at some point the right question and the right creative streak will come together for something entertaining.

cellio: (Monica-old)
Sunday morning the Pennsic camp met for the annual post-mortem. Things actually went pretty well this year, so while there were issues to discuss, it wasn't all that long and involved. And everyone there agreed that there would be no problem with my leaving on the final Friday next year to avoid the Shabbat problems, which is good to hear.

Sunday evening we had dinner with Ralph, Lori, and Mike. It was a fairly normal dinner until the plumbing rebelled. Fortunately, Ralph has plumbing clues and was able to take the kitchen sink apart and find the clog. (Diagnosis: the disposal wasn't.) Unfortunately, that can't have been a pleasant way to spend the last part of the evening. I hope they're able to get it fixed fairly easily.

Last night at choir practice we went through the repertoire, deciding what to remove from the active repertoire and what to bring back (from previous culls). I was surprised by some of the choices; I didn't know anybody actually liked "Pastime with Good Company" or "Belle Qui". No accounting for taste, I suppose. :-) But *whimper*, people wanted to kill one of my favorites, "In Pace", a lovely three-part piece that just flows wonderfully. Oh well; maybe it'll come back in a year or two. Or maybe there'll be an opportunity for a subset of us to perform it at some point.

It sounds like the choir is going to do its usual concert of Christmas music for the 12th Night event, so I get to take a couple months off again. This is fine; I don't mind the break at all.

A couple of the non-Christmas songs that are coming back, and one new one that a group member is proposing, are problematic for me. I'll continue to just sit those out. Fortunately, the choir director understands the issues and is very accommodating -- much moreso than a previous director was. I'll never understand people who say "it doesn't matter what the words are if the music is pretty". (What this usually means, in my experience, is that their own sensitivities just haven't been bumped into, and they can't appreciate other peoples'.)

Last night after rehearsal some of us went to Dave & Buster's for dinner, which meant we got to watch Chris do impressive things with Pump It Up. One song in particular was quite impressive (level 5 and fast), but I didn't note its name.

event

Apr. 28th, 2002 06:08 pm
cellio: (tulips)
Yesterday was the music & dance event. I had lots of fun, and I think things went really well in general.

My class (actually a group-teach with [livejournal.com profile] lrstrobel and Alaric) was in the first time slot and only got one student, but we had a decent discussion. (The topic was organizing/leading music groups -- basically, how to go from "we'd kind of like to do this" to a functional group that performs at events and stuff.) I took several other neat classes, including one on Ars Antiqua vocal music, which is early (medieval, not renaissance) music that sounds really neat. I came away with copies of music that would be suitable for our choir; must remember to make copies for Ray. Ray taught a class on medieval trumpets that was interesting, and at the end he let us try to play the ones he had there. I do not have clues about brass, so it took a while before I could get random things that almost sounded like notes, and none of it was controlled. I was actually doing something different with my lips than I do when I blow a shofar, though the person who explained shofar to me described it as "like brass", so I'm probably doing something wrong there. I can get notes out of a shofar, though. Beginner's luck, I'd bet.

I watched the Caroso-style ball, which is performance-oriented, and enjoyed it. There were some very good dancers there. I especially enjoyed watching Lyev, who does well with flirting and the "story-telling" dances like Gelosia (Jealousy). I bet he'd be a good actor, too. There was a real imbalance of genders, with many more women than men dancing, which is part of why I sat out. There was also some imbalance in who was getting asked to dance and who wasn't, with some people dancing half a dozen times and others dancing once. This might need to be managed more closely when there are significant numbers of non-local dancers. Lia and Fiddle observed that kids are an impediment here; neither of them got asked to dance at all, though at any given point one of them could have easily danced while the other paid attention to the kids (who were behaving).

I thought the choir's performance went pretty well. Most of the pieces went very well; a couple suffered from warts of various degrees of severity. I don't know if the other tenors rely on being able to hear me (I'm in the front row during performances and they're not); there were glitches in places where I'm not used to there being glitches. Of the three of us who were at this performance, I'm probably the strongest on this repertoire currently. Brandon is a strong singer who's still learning the material (he's new to the choir), and Degan lacks both volume and confidence.

After the performance someone in the audience (non-local, and I don't know his name) complimented me on my expression (facial expression, eye contact, mood, whatever). I was glad to hear that, as in the past we've gotten feedback that we don't do well in this area. There was a Pennsic performance where, according to Arianna, the only person seen to be doing this was Roxane, which I found odd as I thought I was doing a good job at that time. So I do what I sometimes worry is too much, but I guess it's ok. And I've learned how to fake eye contact; it's an essential skill for job interviews. :-) (The way my eyes work, if I'm really making eye contact with you you'll see me as staring off into space behind you.)

The food was good. I especially liked the spinach balls, the grape leaves, and the mango lassi (not all at the same time). It turned out that I was unable to shield Dani from the eggplant by eating it all before he got there, because they cooked the eggplant with meat. Oh well.

Robert and Kathy had a post-revel and I got to spend more time talking with some of the out-of-town folks. Avatar came in from Texas with a bunch of instruments. I also got to talk with Phillipia, Mairi, and the Carolingians. Unfortunately I didn't get to talk with Rufina, who drove in from New Jersey. (She taught the Ars Antiqua class.)
cellio: (Monica)
The music & dance event (SCA) is tomorrow. It should be a lot of fun. I ended up wimping out on the composition class, partly because I didn't think there'd be critical mass, partly because I got busy, and partly because someone else is leading a composers' round-table, which I suspect is better calibration for an event this size.

I'll be leading a discussion on starting/running music groups. Our barony is strong in music, but we're unusual in the kingdom. Other people could have music groups too, though.... (I have co-conspirators for this class: the current head of the baronial choir, and a past head of the baronial consort -- both of whom are also members of On the Mark aka Ensemble Rigodon. It's all very incestuous, you see. :-) )

Some of our crashers are supposed to arrive around 6:30, and the others around 10. We're feeding the former dinner; the latter said not to wait for them. Sounds like no services for me tonight. Not ideal, but I don't want to inconvenience our guests that much, and I don't think folks with small children will want to wait until after services for dinner.

I haven't seen Lia and Fiddle (the early-arriving crashers) in a while, so I'm looking forward to visitng with them. I'm also looking forward to visiting with [livejournal.com profile] dagonell and Cigfran, of course, but at least I saw Dagonell in January.
cellio: (Default)
Stolen from [livejournal.com profile] chite:

Recommend me...
1. A movie
2. A book
3. A CD
4. An LJ user not on my friends list
5. A website
6. Something to do in the next two months
cellio: (Default)
I wonder if there are any restaurants in Pittsburgh that are not playing steady streams of Christmas music. Besides the kosher restaurants, I mean, which don't work for lunch or post-Shabbat excursions.

I actually don't mind the better Christmas music so long as it isn't blaring and thus intruding on thoughts/conversation. Basically, don't make me become involved and I can ignore it, or even appreciate the occasional piece's craftsmanship. I think the insipid stuff is a lot worse than the religious stuff. The radio stations or muzak sources or whatever seem to be going entirely for the secular stuff, like "Rudolf" and "Jingle Bell Rock" and "Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer", to name three I heard at Sushi Too today. Sheesh. I think if I were a Christian I'd rather hear *no* music than hear *that* stuff. I can empathize with the people who are unhappy about the secularization of their holiday.

The best compromise IMHO for places like restaurants and public buildings would be to stick to instrumental renditions and lose the cheesy stuff.
cellio: (Default)
I'm pretty much a self-taught musician. I had one semester of private composition lessons at CMU before the job I had there ended prematurely and that became impractical to continue. But mostly I've learned on my own. I think I'm pretty decent at composing and arranging certain types and styles of music (hey, 16th-century counterpoint is fun), but other, often-basic, stuff has just never made it onto my radar.

Sometimes when I arrange modern folk music for On the Mark I get a "WTF? but ok, this works" kind of reaction from the group member who actually knows something about harmony. And sometimes, I do the expected thing, but not necessarily intentionally. (Often, I wuss and have Kathy feed me the chords before I go off and write bass and descant lines.)

My friend Yaakov wrote a song this summer and I offered to write down the melody for him, because he doesn't read/write music and he'd like to be able to share it around. So he recorded himself singing it and I've been working from that. It's not that complicated or long (think your basic 16-bar folk song), and with the exception of one passing note that is inconsistently-sung from verse to verse, it's done.

I should have stopped there, but it occurred to me that one of the ways he'll probably use this is to put this in front of people who play guitar and ask for accompaniment when he sings in bardic circles. (He doesn't play any instruments.) So I figured I should add in some guitar chords for him; after all, how hard could that be? And if he doesn't like them he's free to dump them.

Well, the problem is that he wrote a mixolydian melody, and I never learned how to harmonize modal music. (I did arrange a locrian piece once, but I cheated and did a 2-part arrangement and avoided many obstacles rather than confronting them. It's hard to work with a scale that has a tritone where the fifth should be.) I can write counterpoint against modal melodies with no problem, but I don't know how to harmonize 'em. Just playing around on the computer, I couldn't come up with a set of chords that sounded right, but I can't articulate why the ones I tried sound wrong, either. What I really need is a cheatsheet of some sort where I can look up the standard configurations, to use as a starting point. (E.g. major/ionian probably means 1, 4, and 5 all major, and maybe nothing else, but that pattern (well, 5 minor because of the diminished 7th in the scale) is definitely wrong in this case.)

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags