cellio: (galaxy)
1. What's the best place you've ever been, that others can visit?

Pennsic. :-)

Ok, that's because of the people who show up and the cool stuff they bring with them. It's not much for sight-seeing if you aren't already part of the SCA. But in thinking about this question, I realized that I'm not much of a tourist. I mean, for similar reasons, I could say my grandmother's house (well, except that she is no longer living, so technically you can't go there), but that's because of the ties I have.

2. Who is the most inspiring person you have ever known?

For overall effect on my life, my father. For recent in-depth effect, my rabbi.

I've talked about my father in other recent entries. He encouraged me to be smart, which has less to do with scores on standardized tests and more to do with the way you go about solving problems and answering questions. And he's a good person, easy to talk with and spend time with.

My rabbi is amazing. He taught me that it's not inconsistent to be Reform and be observant. He encourages study and analysis, and is willing to study one-on-one with me. He's intelligent and articulate, and when I'm on the bima what's in the back of my mind is "I hope I can be a tenth as good at this as he is". So he pushes me to get better, to think about ethics and behavior in ways I didn't previously, to study more, to consider more observance -- much of it without realizing he's doing so, I suspect.

3. Were you ever bullied as a child?

Oh heavens yes. A lot. One of my classmates in particular was a real bully starting in first grade; he would pull necklaces off me (breaking the chains), hit, try to trip, and sling insults. The teachers were either ineffective or unwilling; I'm not sure which. There were many conferences with both parents, to no avail. The physical aspects eventually died down when an enlightened principal gave me blanket permission to fight back in a particular way. Specifically, I was using large-print books due to a vision problem, which meant I had special books that were about four times the volume of the regular text books, and he specifically told me to hit this bully with one of my books if I needed to. (I lamented the fact that I was not strong enough to wield the dictionary. :-) )

Non-physical bullying was a staple all through school, because I wasn't pretty, I had an obvious physical defect, I wasn't into the sports/cheerleader thing, and I was smart. This is an eperience that many of my (current) friends shared.

4. What are your ten favorite words?

Interesting question. I wonder if this is anything like what you had in mind. :-) (No, those aren't the words.)

Think. Question. Passion. Justice. Compassion. Connection. Fun. Life. God. Ginger. :-) (Hey, I had to throw in one silly one. But it's one of my favorite ingredients...)

5. What do you want to leave as your legacy on this earth?

That the world was in some way a better place because I was in it.

I hope I have a significant impact on my family, friends, and immediate religious community. If I am very lucky, some of what I do will have broader ripples. Maybe through my writing I can bring encouragement or insight to people I don't even know. Maybe through my involvement in the Jewish community I an lead other Reform Jews to take religion more seriously. Maybe through my music I can make people smile or think or sigh contentedly.


The rules:
1. Leave a comment, saying you want to be interviewed.
2. I'll ask you five questions.
3. Update your journal with my five questions, and your five answers.
4. Include this explanation.
5. Ask other people five questions when they want to be interviewed.

cellio: (galaxy)
Instructions:
1. Copy this whole list into your journal.
2. Bold the things that you have in common with me.
3. Whatever you don't bold, replace with things about you.

Read more... )

cellio: (galaxy)
When we were visiting my parents last week, my father asked me if I had heard that "[your] school's team won the [cryptic string of letters] championship". Huh? I said. It turned out he was talking about the football team from my high school, which had just won some regional tournament.

He seemed to assume in all seriousness that I would have some loyalty to this team or that I would care. My only connection to it is having graduated from that school more than 20 years ago. I don't know the players or coach, nor do I have any past association with high-school sports.

It's not just my father and high-school sports, of course. It's kind of expected that sports fans will root for the home team -- and that voters will vote for the local candidate, and that people will generally show some pride when someone who shares ethnicity, an alma mater, or the like does something noteworthy.

I don't care about such factors, however. For me, it's all about relevant factors, quality chief among them. Now I might end up knowing more about the similar person/team/company/whatever, and that may lead to favor, but the favor does not derive directly from the connection.

I don't root for the US teams at the Olympics or the Steelers/Pirates here. (Bad example, I know, because I don't follow football or baseball anyway, but if I did, I wouldn't necessarily favor those teams. I would favor the teams that showed the best balance of skill and sportsmanship, whoever they are.) I don't vote for politicians just because they're from my neighborhood/county/state, or women, or Jewish, or Carnegie-Mellon alums, or (speaking theoretically) SCA members or coworkers.

Now there are some areas where having something in common can affect a decision. In an election for city council, the guy who actually lives here and participates in the community has an edge over the guy with a local post-office box who's never seen on the streets. Or, if all other factors are equal (which they rarely are), I'd probably vote for the candidate who shares my religious views, because those views can affect how one governs (or judges, since we elect judges here). But that's not at all the same thing as favoring the secular Jew just because he's named Rosenblum.

I've seen a lot of campaigns that amounted to "vote to put a woman in office" or "vote for the home-town candidate". (And, of course, the "vote party line" appeals.) That sort of thing is actually less likely to get my vote, because they should have been talking about issues instead of appealing to my presumed "nationalism" ("statism"? "townism"?).

Now voting is important and sports are not, but I suspect that a lot of people base loyalties on the same kinds of factors in both. But I just don't feel that connection -- that someone went to the same school or lives in the same town is casually interesting, in a small-talk sort of way, but not really relevant.

cellio: (fire)
Assertion: if something is important enough to you, you'll make time for it. So if you don't have time, it's probably just not important enough to you. (It doesn't matter whether "it" is a hobby, a political cause, reading the daily newspaper, watching a certain TV show, or whatever.)

An objection I saw raised to this (in a protected entry) was, basically, that people are busy, so being too busy doesn't mean the thing isn't important. But that misses the point, I think.

Yes, of course people are busy. I'm certainly very busy, at least. But my not having time for a given activity does not pass a value judgement on the activity -- just on that activity for me at this time.

Maybe I'm weird, but when I consider taking on something new, I ask myself where the time will come from. It has to come from somewhere, after all, and those college-age days of just saying "I'll sleep less" are long past. Certain time commitments are non-negotiable: job, family time, sleep, religious commitments. (That's not an ordered list.) All else is optional. (Of course commitments once made must be kept absent permission to break them. I'm not talking about that; I'm talking about the initial decision to take on the activity/commitment.)

When my music group (On the Mark) started, I realized that for me the time would come from the informal instrumental group I was playing with. When I became generally more active on the net, that time came from casual reading (particularly science fiction). When I started using LiveJournal, I dropped some mailing lists and put the final nail in the Usenet coffin. When I began to spend more time on religion, that time came from SCA involvement. (Within the "SCA" box there has also been an ebb and flow -- fighting gave way to choir, dancing to brewing (and music), archery to scribal time, scribal time to dance research (and persona research), and so on.) When I recently became chair of a synagogue committee, I planned for an easy initial chunk of time until my board term ends in May. And, yeah, there was one season of Babylon 5 for which the answer was "sleeping less one night a week isn't so bad".

The point is: to do things you have to give up other things. Sometimes there's nothing you are ready to give up, and that's a sign that you shouldn't be taking on that new thing right now. (Again thinking about the SCA, sometimes college freshmen fail to anticipate the competing time demands of SCA activities and classes. Classes have to come first.) Sometimes there are things you could give up but the new activity just isn't important enough for you to do so -- maybe your weekly commitment to fighting practice is more important than a new gaming group. So you don't "have time" for the gaming group, but if your situation were different you would have time for gaming and no longer have time for fighting.

There are only so many hours in the day. When something new comes along, I ask myself: is there anything I'm doing, and that I'm not committed to, that is less interesting than this new thing? If so, I consider a swap. If not, then I don't have time for the new thing right now, though I might have a year ago or might a year from now.

cellio: (moon)
If you could have 10 knowledge modules installed in your head right now, what would they be?

(I will assume that these are modules that could currently exist, rather than things like "cure for cancer". :-) )

1. Hebrew. All flavors -- biblical, classical, modern, dilects... written and spoken.

2. Music theory. All of it -- medieval, renaissance, modern.

3. That combination of psychology, sociology, political science, and whatnot that would allow me to determine what someone means and what he's trying to do, rather than what he says.

4. Cooking technique, particularly meat, particularly red.

5. Update to current CS technologies -- design patterns (catalogue), concurrency, N-tier/peer-to-peer/client-server/other architectures, performance without sacrificing design, and much much more. (Do I have to expend a separate slot on encyclopedic knowledge of Java?)

6. Names, faces, and key facts about everyone likely to ever be relevant to me, indexed for quick and reliable access.

7. Handyman 101, including carpentry, plumbing, and electricity.

8. Playing bowed strings (viola da gamba, cello, etc -- ok, violin is ok too :-) ).

9. Literary and historic classics, indexed for retrieval by quote, obscure character name, plot point, miscellaneous factoid, and so on.

10. Photography.

cellio: (moon)
1. If you were running for president, what would the major points of your platform be? Read more... )


2. What is the best job you've ever had? What did you like about it? Read more... )


3. Aside from religion, what is one aspect of your philosophy, beliefs, or lifestyle that has changed significantly in your life? What motivated the change, and how did you go about it? Read more... )


4. When you were growing up, who in your family did you feel closest to? What was the best thing about that relationship? Are you still as close to them now? Read more... )


5. Consider the following scenario: Read more... )

cellio: (moon)
Recently I've found myself in several unrelated conversations about observance levels and attitudes toward halacha. I'm now going to try to wrestle assorted thoughts on the subject into a coherent whole.

Read more... )

brain meme

Jun. 3rd, 2003 10:05 pm
cellio: (mandelbrot)
I don't know whether the questions or evaluation techniques are at all credible; cognitive psych was a long time ago for me. But I found an odd mix of resonance and surprise in the results of the "brain profile" meme that's going around, so what the heck.

Caution (for the ~5 people on my friends list who haven't seen this yet): because I had seen others' results and knew approximately what the test set out to measure, I was a little more aware of meta-issues than was probably ideal. The test is here.

results )

comments )

Torah study

Jun. 1st, 2003 12:17 am
cellio: (star)
"Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people; neither shalt thou stand idly by the blood of thy neighbour: I am the Lord." -Lev 19:16, JPS translation

We spent a while talking about this verse this morning. We started out talking about gossip and ended up talking about whistle-blowing.

(Rashi interprets the first part as: don't be a peddler of tales, a "retailer" (I wonder who introduced the pun, him or a translator).)

We talked about how the Chofetz Chayim says that gossip harms three people: the subject, the speaker, and the listener. We talked about how a need to know can override (that's where the whistle-blower thread came from). For example, the talmud argues that if you know of evidence that would clear someone of an accuastion, you are required (under Jewish law) to testify to that effect. (The judicial system under Jewish law is very much weighted toward the defendant, in case you're wondering. It's not clear that a death sentence was ever carried out, for example.)

I asked if the talmud draws this conclusion based on the fact that "don't be a tale-bearer" and "don't stand by the blood of your neighbor" are linked in the same verse. (The rabbi said yes, that's right.)

Some people who were there didn't see the real harm in gossip; I guess it's part of current American culture. I'm with the Chofetz Chayim (though not nearly as careful as he was): spreading rumors can do a great deal of harm, and it's harm that's very hard to undo should you later determine that you were in error. It's tempting, but I try to resist. Often fail, but I try to do better.

One thing that makes gossip especially bad is that most people seem to be pre-disposed to believe what they're told; critical thinkers are in the minority, from what I've seen. One thing I've been trying to work on is to look for the positive (or at least neutral) explanation for what appears to be bad behavior. And y'know, sometimes that guess even turns out to be right. Nifty when that happens.

cellio: (Monica-old)
INTJ (also here) - what a surprise. :-) Actually, last time I took this test, about 7 or 8 years ago, I think I came out as ISTJ -- but both times I've been within 5% of the N/S line, so that's not really a change. Hmm, I was more J then than now, IIRC. Still very T, which should surprise no one.

Introverted (I) 61% Extraverted (E) 39%
Intuitive (N) 55% Sensing (S) 45%
Thinking (T) 85% Feeling (F) 15%
Judging (J) 55% Perceiving (P) 45%

The quiz -- a subset of the full Myers-Briggs test, worth what you paid for it, but interesting anyway. The real MBTI has some serious methodology issues, so it always boggles my mind to hear of places that use it seriously, like a past employer of mine tried to do. But as cocktail-party fodder, it's just fine.

cellio: (tulips)
The poll is here.

Do you have any big regrets?

Yes.

Oh, that's probably not the question you really wanted to ask. Ok, I can elaborate. :-)

The only time that I initiated a breakup of a romantic relationship, it played out badly and I feel that this was largely my fault. I'm not certain what specifically I could have done better, but I'm sure I could have handled it better in some way. The other person got hurt pretty badly (though he tried not to let it show), which was certainly no one's intent, and the friendship has never been the same. (It wasn't a hostile breakup; it was more of a "this isn't going to work" situation.)


Somehow you are on my read list.... do you know how you got there because I don't remember...

I don't know. As far as I know we don't know each other in real life, and we don't appear to have friends in common right now. Maybe we did and you saw me on a "friends of friends" list, or maybe you surfed randomly or via similar interests?


How far is your shul from where you are and how long does it take you to walk there?

Approximately 1 mile (less as the mole digs, but that's not an accurate measure of surface distance -- it just means don't trust maps in Pittsburgh). It takes me about 20 minutes to walk there on average. I can rush it in 15 minutes or so, but I rarely feel the need to rush on Shabbat.


Would you mind telling your conversion story (the long version)?

I don't mind. Let me try to figure out the best way to bridge the gap between the short summary and the longer version that, among things, manifested in approximately 150 pages of journal at the time. This may take a few days.

Actually, here's an oddball question (which is not, itself, an answer to your question, but more of a tangent): I could post that journal over a similar span of time in a different LJ ("reruns"?). It would take about a year altogether. (I think there's value in not just reading it all at once. I can't just post the entire thing as-is anyway, as I have to edit out people's real names and stuff like that.) Would this be at all interesting to anyone? Don't worry; I'm not using this as a way to blow off your question.

I'll also entertain more-specific questions by email, if that helps any. The hardest thing about trying to tell a big story is figuring out the parts that would be seen as interesting and significant to others.

cellio: (tulips)
Read more... )

Coming up sometime after Shabbat: more on religion, a visit from Dr. Science, and assorted others. Keep 'em coming.

cellio: (moon)
1. Explain why you started to journal/blog. Read more... )
cellio: (tulips)
It's good to google yourself occasionally. Currently, the first 100 hits I get are mostly my home page, pages about Joy and Jealousy (a book I co-wrote on 15th-century Italian dance), lots of benign SCA stuff, filk, folk music, and employment (company directories and the like).

One of the links to the dance book is in Cyrillic, oddly enough, so I now know one way to transliterate my name into that character set. I wonder if it's a phonetic transliteration and, if so, how the author thinks my last name is pronounced.

There's a link to a page of credits for Common Lisp: The Language. (I was an undergrad assistant, and can actually point to some of my words in the finished book.) There's also a link to a recipe that an SCA friend named after me, which I didn't realize he had published with that name until more recently.

It's not until link #54 that you get the first reference to a lawsuit I was involved in some years back, and that's for the award of attorneys' fees and costs, which means no one can reasonably claim it was a frivolous suit. (Oddly, I don't recognize the site that archived that.) Hints that this journal exists start showing up in the 40s, but you'd have to already know about LJ to recognize them. (The journal itself isn't indexed, but that doesn't prevent interest lists and the userinfo page from showing up.)

All in all, I think potential stalkers would get bored. Which is the correct outcome. :-)

Update: This entry was inspired by this article, which was pointed out by [livejournal.com profile] browngirl. (Nothing new here for me, but it's a good summary/overview.)

cellio: (lilac)
A friend recently asked what musical instruments I play (and how well). In writing the answer, I realized something about how my brain is (or isn't) wired for playing music.

I play hammer dulcimer (well), bodhran (competently), hand drums/tambourines/etc (minimally), and bowed psaltry (basically competent). I had several years of piano lessons as a child, but can't do anything more than very basic stuff now (oops). I used to play appalachian dulcimer a little, but haven't in years. I've played around with harps a little bit, but never learned to play.

I tried to learn folk guitar when I was in high school, but my fingers were too short to chord correctly. (They probably still are, though back then I didn't know that there were guitars with narrow necks for people like me.) I also had trouble wrapping my brain around this "non-linear" instrument; at that point the only instrument I had played was piano, where the notes were nicely in a row from lowest to highest. Of course that's true on a fret board as well, but the parallelism of doing it six times with offsets confused me. Still does, somewhat, though I've played really simple bass lines (electric bass) on a couple songs that On the Mark does. Really simple, though. And I memorized the relevant fret/string positions; if you asked me to find a particular note (that's not an open string) I would have to stop and compute. That gets better with practice, of course, but I find it challenging.

I have played around with recorders a bit, but haven't put the time in to actually achieve competence. I find learning the fingerings to be hard.

The conclusion I draw from all of this is that while I am good with timing and rhythm, I am not so good with fingerings, especially if I have to move several fingers at once in order to change pitch. I think of music "horizontally", not "vertically", and I think of notes as single things that you do, not aggregates of multiple actions. (This horizontal/vertical thing applies to singing, too. I can sing arbitrarily-complex counterpoint, and stand a decent chance of sight-reading it not too badly, but close harmony drives me batty as a singer, as does your stereotypical randomly-jumping-around alto line.) Obviously I can play instruments that use all the fingers, as I was competent on piano lo these many years ago, but I suspect the linear nature of the instrument makes a big difference for me.

If all of this is true, then it should be a predictor of other instruments that would be good, or bad, for me to try. It's a pity that cello or viola da gamba is probably on the "bad" side of that evaluation; I love the sound of deep, rich, bowed strings.

cellio: (mandelbrot)
Stolen from [livejournal.com profile] tangerinpenguin:

Thirteen things that have been going really well for me:

1. Interesting work. I get to do technical writing for programmers, rather than for end users. And I'm good at it.

2. I work for a company that treats its people really well. I'm not talking about money (though the pay is competitive); I'm talking about the things that really matter on a day-to-day basis, like respect and professionalism.

3. I have a great relationship with my rabbi. I am thrilled that he is willing to learn with me one on one. How many people get that opportunity without enrolling in yeshiva?

4. I'm having even more fun than I expected to in [livejournal.com profile] ralphmelton's D&D game.

5. [livejournal.com profile] ralphmelton, [livejournal.com profile] lorimelton, and [livejournal.com profile] mrpeck have gone from being casual acquaintances/coworkers to being really good friends (with me, I mean :-) ), initially through the mechanism of Sunday dinner.

6. I heard a bunch of great music at a recent convention and have gotten a couple of friends hooked on Clam Chowder (the group, not the soup).

7. I'm getting to know a lot of interesting people through LJ, some of whom are friends in real life.

8. I've been filling in occasionally for a congregation that doesn't have a cantor, on Friday nights. Not only am I doing a good job, but they really like me.

9. Soon, I will be able to move my office upstairs out of the cold basement. Shelves are being installed in the new room, possibly as I write this.

10. On the Mark sounds really good with the new lineup.

11. My SCA group is being reasonable in the face of unreasonable demands from above. It didn't look like it was going to play out this way.

12. Dani, my family, and the cats are all healthy and doing well.

13. I have lost enough weight that people have noticed, though not as much as I need to (nor as quickly as some of my friends are losing it), without doing anything more formal than paying attention to what I eat and trying to walk more.

cellio: (moon)
Some of my attitudes, political and social, have shifted a bit in the past several years. I think some of this is related to religious changes, but only related, not really caused by. I am not and have never been a member of the religious right.

I didn't know the word "libertarian" until sometime during college. It's a pretty good characterization. I've long been offended by the economics of liberals and the "we know best" agendas of conservatives. (Obviously, I am generalizing here.) I have long been annoyed, in particular, by the agenda of liberals on "social issues" like welfare and social security. I believe that as far as governments are concerned, this is a purely private matter. Voluntary charity, not coerced taxes, should fund programs for the poor, and each person should be responsible for his own retirement planning (and will likely do a better job of managing such funds, because it's in his best interest).

a ramble lies ahead )

cellio: (lilac)
A friend recently wrote that he feels that he's not as "together" as the people he sees around him. I wanted to record (an abridged copy of) my reply here.
Do you believe that what you see of someone else is the entirety of that person? Most of us hide the bad stuff inside, so you see only the better qualities in other people and everything in yourself. You're not getting a balanced view.

If you don't like something about yourself, examine it and figure out a plan of attack. But don't do it because you think you're not as "good" as other people, because, as I said, your view of other people is flawed. And don't do it because it's what you think others expect. The only changes that ever stick are the ones that you are motivated to make for selfish reasons. Yes, selfish, as in "I'm doing this for me", not "I'm doing this so so-and-so will like me" or "I'm doing this because my doctor says I should" or "I'm doing this because I'll go to hell if I don't".

Several years ago I decided that I needed to work on compassion and consideration and seeing the other side of a conflict and stuff like that (broadly, the "judge others favorably" category). I think I've done pretty well with this (yes, of course I've had slip-ups; who hasn't?), and now frequently look for favorable explanations for what looks like bad behavior. (Yeah, sometimes people are just jerks and you can't whitewash it, but more often there's a legitimate misunderstanding.) Tackling this may have been my greatest personal accomplishment of the last decade, and it couldn't happen until I decided it was important.
cellio: (Default)
We got a new CFO today. When her predecessor (now VP of business dev) introduced us, the new CFO said "oh, I know Monica". Err, umm, ack... I felt embarrassed because while she looked kind of familiar I could just *not* place her (and probably lots of people look kind of familiar who aren't really). But then she went on: "you were at CGI, weren't you?".

Yes, I was. I left in 1988.

Ok, how many of you still clearly remember the people you worked with in 1988 (you young'ns can skip this question), especially those who were *not* your day-to-day coworkers? I mean, it's not like Robin was another engineer I worked with all the time; she was probably one of the accountants or something. I don't remember.

I've always been bad with names and faces, but somehow I don't think this one reflects that badly on me. :-)

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags