cellio: (avatar)
I bought a used DVD through Amazon, and I'm a little suspicious that what I got was a bootleg. I'd like to do a little detective work before asking the seller about it, because I'm only suspicious and it could be completely legitimate and why stir up trouble unnecessarily? But my Google-fu is failing me. What I want to find is a photo of the DVD label for the published DVD. Anyone have any ideas?
cellio: (B5)
This fall I've seen two new shows with lots of promise.

Studio 60 in the Sunset Strip is Aaron Sorkin's new show. He did a great job with West Wing and Sports Night (I haven't seen all of the latter yet), so I had to check it out. The witty dialogue and fast interchanges are back. This time the venue is the production crew of a live comedy show (Saturday Night Live with the serial numbers filed off). In the first episode of the real show, the fictional show is almost immediately plunged into controversy. Their handling of it in the first new episode of the fictional show was brilliant. There have been two episodes so far, so it's not too late to catch up.

The other new show is Jericho. If you liked Jeremiah then run (don't walk) to your VCR or DVR and check this out. There have only been two episodes, so there's plenty of opportunity for it to go sour later, but so far I'm finding it compelling. (The second episode included a recap from the first, so I assume there'll be no problem jumping in with the third episode next week.)

Jericho is a small rural town (5000 people). In the opening episode the residents see a mushroom cloud in the direction of the nearest major city (Denver) and then they lose power and communications. There are reasons to believe the problem is more widespread than just Denver (trying to avoid spoilers here). Now, if this goes in the direction of a political drama or a hunt for the guys who did this, it won't be interesting. So far, though, the focus seems to be solidly at the character level, watching the people of Jericho deal with the situation. There are several characters with interesting potential and obvious secrets. (Does anyone in the audience really believe that the guy from Saint Louis is who he says he is? I sure don't.) I'm looking forward to seeing how this plays out.

low-tech

Sep. 17th, 2006 02:36 pm
cellio: (B5)
The ultra-basic cable service that was $12/month when I signed up is now up to $18/month, and we don't watch that much TV anyway, and we've moved the TV since the last time I tried to pull in local channels without cable. So today I went out and bought a pair of rabbit ears. (Dani didn't think I'd be able to find them in a store. Ha! I'm not the only TV Luddite in Pittsburgh. :-) ) They are provisionally hooked up to one VCR, and I'll run that in parallel with the cable (different feed) for a little while to see if the reduced-but-probably-adequate signal is, in fact, adequate. So far I've managed to pull in NBC, CBS, ABC, and PBS, but not WB and Fox. I think I need to reconfigure the VCR for it to see the UHF (VHF? I mean numbers over 13) channels, which is where these two live.

Due to historical quirks we actually have three VCRs hooked up to the TV rather than the canonical one (viewing) or two (dubbing). This has in the past been handy for segregating taping (especially when things conflict -- ever notice how if you only care about three or four shows, two of them will still be on at the same time?). I had thought to hook the rabbit ears up to the cable splitter that's feeding those VCRs, but a few more minutes of thought would have showed me why that wouldn't work before I actually installed the rabbit ears and started playing with them. But that's ok; if it should ever be relevant in the future, there's room on top of the TV for a second pair of $12 rabbit ears.

The theory I'm going to test out is: rabbit ears will be good enough for the network shows I want to see right now, everything else comes out a year later on DVD (and VHS for archival is dead or dying), and NetFlix is cheaper than cable. (I haven't actually joined NetFlix yet, but I will when I have a long-enough list of stuff I want to see that I don't want to buy.)
cellio: (B5)
Hummingbirds from egg to flight, courtesy of [livejournal.com profile] otterblossom.

Scott Adams speaks sense about flag-burning.

Lesson learned: interns go where you point them. :-) They'll do exactly what you tell them to do, and they haven't been out in the world long enough to encounter nuance, so don't give vague directions. (In this case: swap in this new logger class, and while you're at it get rid of the direct calls to System.out.println(). Um, yeah -- I should have said explicitly to replace them with calls to the logger where it made sense to do so. I didn't mean wipe them out entirely. Fortunately, that's why we have change control.)

I recently picked up (at deep discount) the first season of a TV show called Jeremiah, pretty much entirely because J. Michael Straczynski wrote it. (Well, he wrote the episodes; the story is based on a comic book by someone else.) The show ran two seasons on Showtime c. 2002-2003. Only the first is available on DVD, so there is disappointment down the road for me, but so far I'm really enjoying what I've seen (six episodes). The premise is that 15 years ago some mega-virus wiped out everyone on earth past puberty; the kids who survived are now adults living in the aftermath. Jeremiah and his sidekick Kurdy are two of the guys in (figurative) white hats; my one-word characterization of Jeremiadh is "paladin". Jeremiah is trying to find a place his parents named before they died, though he's not sure why it's important, and the few people who've heard of it won't talk about it. We've seen glimpses of his back-story (particularly that he feels responsible for his brother's death) and I assume more will be forthcoming. So far the show seems to be episodic with a loose arc, but it's early yet. speculation -- not technically spoilers, I don't think, but cut anyway )

cellio: (B5)
We went to see my parents on Sunday. It was nice to see them again. Apparently my niece is serious about wanting to move to Italy after she graduates. More power to her. She's an art (art-history? not sure if she formally changed) major who wants a museum job (specifics unknown to me); it seems like that'd be hard to come by and almost certainly means moving anyway, so she may as well go for what excites her if she can.

My parents wanted to show off their shiny new mall (Pittsburgh Mills), but it was raining so we didn't see much of it. I am not a recreational shopper (unless it caters to my particular obsessions, but I don't get excited over things like clothes), and mostly one expanse of stores is much like another to me, so shrug. I don't need to see the third local Barnes & Noble or the 437th Starbucks; I care about the unusual or unique stores, but they are very much the minority in such developments. (And in the "some things never change" department, service in the new mall's new Eat & Park was very slow. We were on the verge of walking out without paying not because we're that kind of people but because we couldn't find anyone who would take our money.)

Later Sunday we went to afternoon tea hosted by a friend, but the aforementioned rain meant we didn't go out into her garden. It was a pleasant gathering, though, and the tea and little sandwiches and cookies were tasty.

Dani and I didn't catch Firefly when it was on TV, so when we were recently ordering stuff anyway we picked up the show on DVD. We've seen three episodes so far, and it's got my attention. I take it we aren't going to find out what's up with River before the end of the show (or the movie)? I was a little surprised to see how overtly a western it is -- the horses in the first episode and the bar fight in the second augmented the soundtrack and the characters' general style. :-)

Given how little TV we watch (less now that West Wing and Commander in Chief are done), I wonder if it would ultimately be cheaper to cancel the cable and just buy the interesting shows when they come out on DVD. As a benchmark for lag time I just checked Amazon, and this year's Invasion is due out in August. But hey -- it says "complete series"? Did they really not renew it? Bummer -- I'd heard that they did, but apparently they changed their minds.

cellio: (B5)
There's something I don't get, and it seems to affect enough people I know that I ought to get it in self-defense. Some people prioritize TV shows -- which can be recorded and watched later -- over important things they would otherwise do with other people. Two examples from yesterday:

Yesterday afternoon I was helping a friend pack for a move. She expected another good friend to be there too (she'd said she would), but that friend showed up as we were finishing with the explanation that she had to watch the football game first. (The friend I was helping, on the other hand, was listening to the game on the radio while we packed.)

Our congregation is currently interviewing for an associate rabbi, and I'm on the search committee. A couple weeks ago we were given the date for a visit from one candidate. Last night we got the schedule of activities, which includes stuff on Sunday afternoon. A member of the committee (and one who really needs to be involved in this) sent mail saying he wanted to watch the football game for 4.5 hours out of the middle of that day and asked that we reschedule things. Sunday, by the way, is the only full day available for most of us; the candidate is flying in Saturday night and most of us work Monday. (He'll be spending Monday with synagogue staff.) Not to put too fine a point on it, but the choice of associate rabbi will affect us for several years; getting it wrong would be bad.

Now I understand that, to those who care, these are important football games. But in neither case are these people looking for excuses to avoid the other activities; they are just prioritizing the games over in the first case helping a friend and in the second case a significant congregational obligation. While I don't care about sports there have been TV shows (well ok, show) that I was obsessive about, ones that I made sure to see on the day of the broadcast because (1) I was eager and (2) I didn't want conversations the next day to spoil things for me. But I didn't stay home from places I would otherwise have been; I used the VCR. It didn't matter if I watched the broadcast at 9 or the tape at 11, after all. And this was true even for the climactic episodes, the ones we waited all week for. The only exception I ever made to this was for a season where the broadcast was at 11PM; I made sure to be home from the post-SCA-meeting socializing in time. Given that the meetings were at 8 and lasted an hour or so, I didn't feel I was blowing anyone off.

What is the thrill of watching a TV show live, a thrill that's significant enough that you'll pre-empt other plans?

random bits

Jan. 6th, 2006 04:42 pm
cellio: (sleepy-cat)
A month or two ago I saw a commercial for a new TV show called The Book of Daniel. It looked interesting, but it was a while ago and I had completely forgotten about it -- until some bible-belt protesters managed to get some southern stations to not show tonight's premier, thus making the news and reminding me to set the VCR. (I only saw the one commercial, but it struck me as "respectful but off-beat", like the movie Oh God!, and not the blasphemy the protesters allege.) I suspect we're dealing with either stupid protesters or a smart, manipulative network. I mean, isn't the news the best advertising money can buy?

Erik still needs to gain weight, so he'd been eating mostly canned food. A friend suggested (and the vet concurred) that feeding him baby food might help (more protein), so I bought a few jars of that to try out the idea. He loves that! (Or, to be more precise, so far he loves chicken puree.) Because baby food is intended for people, it has nutrition information -- which tells me that a small jar is 70 calories and 6g of protein. (A baby's RDA of protein seems to be 14-15g.) This makes me wonder what ordinary feline nutrition needs are. Cat food, not being intended for humans, doesn't come with the FDA-required data dump.

I've been listening to a CD by Neshama Carlebach that I picked up recently ("Journey", IIRC). I was surprised to notice that she uses the Sephardi pronunciation of Hebrew -- surprised because her father, who was also a famous singer and songwriter (in addition to being a rabbi) used the Ashkenazi pronunciation. I guess I just assumed she'd follow her father in this, though I'm glad she didn't 'cause Sephardi is what I'm used to and it makes it easier for me to understand what I'm listening to.

I never thought it would be so much hassle to evict a mailing list. I'm currently hosting a list at my shell provider. There is a Yahoo mirror of the list, but for historic reasons that's not the "main" list. Well, I want to stop hosting it, so that's going to change now. This should be a simple matter of moving subscribers, flipping a switch at Yahoo (so direct posting is allowed), and shutting down the current (non-Yahoo) list. In practice, though, moving subscriptions requires the subscribers' active participation (which isn't happening), and only the owner of the Yahoo list can flip that switch (I'm a moderator; the owner is bouncing email), and I'm starting to wonder if moving the list requires sacrificing a goat under a full moon at midnight or some such. (Which would be a problem, as that's pretty likely to be avodah zarah, or alien worship. And squicky. :-) )

random bits

Sep. 4th, 2005 04:43 pm
cellio: (avatar)
The good news is that our DVD player now works. The bad news is that the repair guy says he didn't do anything to it. All I did was to disconnect it, drive it to the repair place, wait several days, and pick it up. (Prior to that, of course, I had disconnected the cable, tested it, cleaned it, reconnected it, and still gotten no sound.) I had forgotten that repair folks have an uncanny knack of looking at a device and causing it to work. I wonder how long the effect lasts.

He also pointed out a test to eliminate the TV: run the signal through a VCR. Yeah, it degrades the signal and that's not a permanent solution, but it's good enough for a test. Running a DVD signal to a VCR never occurred to me -- but then, bootlegging DVDs onto tape never occurred to me, either.

At Shabbat services we had both rabbis, for the first time in at least a month. We also had a large turnout, including some prospective new members. I guess that's one way to tell that summer is ending. :-)

This week, my rabbi said, pretty much all of the congregations in town (not just Jewish, everyone) started organizing efforts to relocate storm refugees to Pittsburgh. (Those that want to come here, that is. No one's insisting, but we do have space.) Apparently we've got hundreds of spots already and buses ready to go, just as soon as FEMA will let us talk to the refugees and drive those buses in to get the ones who want to come.

This map shows some of the bigger disaster risks in the US (funny). I forget who provided the link.

There have been lots of posts on some SCA lists trying to organize replacement SCA stuff for the folks hit by the hurricane -- new garb, scrolls, etc. Their hearts are in the right places, but most of this seems months premature to me. Let those people get housing before you start saddling them with stuff!

Why do so many people on mailing lists believe that a major event trumps the topic of the list? These people seem to think that somehow you won't find out about national news if you don't read it on the SCA kingdom list -- as if that was each subscriber's only source of information. Sheesh. The people on the lists I frequent are being better about this than they were for 9/11, but still... I've been deleting a lot of stuff from the moderation queue for one list.

cellio: (mars)
Welcome to LJ, [livejournal.com profile] osewalrus (aka [livejournal.com profile] hfeld_blog).

Last night's D&D game was fun (though long). The campaign will be ending soon, and that makes me sad even though it's necessary. Ralph set out, four years ago, to play out a particular story arc, and we're almost done. We've had some great moments, and we have some good story yet to come. I wonder what we'll do when it's all over.

We're nearly done watching Wonderfalls, a half-season TV show we borrowed on DVD. The first half-dozen episodes were wacky and quirky in a fun way, and on that basis we bought a copy for a friend as a gift. The last few episodes have been growing more dark and weird. While I know that the decision to kill it was made by episode #4 (that's all that aired), I'm not sure the outcome would have differed if the entire run had been allowed to air. But then, maybe something's coming in the last episode to tie it all up; we'll see.

From the "just shoot me now" department: We got a glimpse of the new time-tracking system we'll have to use at work starting in a couple weeks. The first sign that this would not meet our usual high standards for user interfaces came in the text shown in the desktop icon: "3270". Yup -- text-based COBOL system, no shortcuts, no UI brains. Whee.

One WallMart now requires employees to commit to work any shift, 24x7, or be fired (link from [livejournal.com profile] revlaniep). Got kids with specific day-care hours? Have a problem working on the sabbath? Tough noogies. I found this quote from the article ironic: "The officials who did know were attending a conference on diversity and could not be reached, he said." Diversity, huh?

cellio: (moon-shadow)
Generally when I'm reading/watching fiction that revolves around a main character, I want that character to be a hero -- someone I'm sympathetic to and whose actions, in context, I can more or less agree with. I said "more or less" -- nothing's perfect, after all, and following only characters like me would be boring. On the flip side, I can sometimes get into the right "anti-hero" as a character study if presented well.

This doesn't come up in all fiction, of course. A TV show with an ensemble cast, by definition, doesn't call out one character as "the main guy", and I find I both tolerate and relish many shades of gray there. B5's Londo is a fascinating character to me, for instance. I actually prefer ensemble shows, by the way, because they seem to allow for richer characters.

Jack Bauer on 24 tries to be a hero, but as this season goes on I'm becoming convinced that he is pretty much completely amoral, and there's nothing heroic about that. The character and the show do not fit any of the molds I've described as liking -- he's not a hero I identify with, he's not a fascinating character study, and 24 certainly is not an ensemble show. And yet I find myself watching it every week, and wanting to watch it on the broadcast night. I don't know why.

This ramble was inspired in particular by the last five minutes of this week's episode. There darn well better be consequences.

Edit: A cleaner way of saying this might be: if there is a main character then I want to either like or be fascinated by him; this is not true of Jack Bauer; yet I still watch.

cellio: (out-of-mind)
[livejournal.com profile] schulman, who might have been a pusher in a past life, lent us Wonderfalls on DVD. This was a very-short-lived TV show that I've heard her gush about. But I'd never picked up from the gushing just what the show is about.

We just watched the first two episodes. I understand the problem now. :-)

This show is really bizarre, but in a way that, so far at least, is motivating us to keep watching. I could describe the broad plot outline, but you'd either think it was stupid or accuse me of making it up. Maybe it'll make more sense when we've seen the other 12 episodes, though I suppose there's always the possibility that it'll make less sense after that. But I'll take my chances.

Ah, Google to the rescue. Here's how TV Tome describes it: "Set against the backdrop of Niagara Falls, Wonderfalls is a quirky one-hour family dramedy about an underachieving twenty-something souvenir shop worker named Jaye Tyler. Her life is forever changed when inanimate figures – including toys, cartoons and anything in the form of an animal, begin to talk to her. In each episode, the creatures' cryptic messages set into motion a chain of unpredictable events that invariably lead Jaye into the lives of others in need."

"Quirky" -- yeah, that's a good word. :-)
cellio: (out-of-mind)
While setting a videotape I caught a bit of a show I hadn't previously heard of, Eye for an Eye. Initially it looked like any other court-with-actual-people show (Judge Judy et al). The first clue that this was not the case was that the judge goes by the name "Extreme Akim". The second was his verdict in the custody dispute over a parrot: whichever litigant eats more worms in the courtroom obviously loves the bird more and so will win custody. I can't make this stuff up. (I also didn't continue watching after that, but I assume the plan was to carry out the verdict immediately.)

TV bits

Jan. 6th, 2005 08:33 pm
cellio: (mars)
Someone is getting a new trial in a murder case because of false testimony: "An expert witness for the state testified that Yates may have been influenced by an episode of the TV show "Law & Order" in which [...]. No such show ever aired. Yates was convicted in 2002". It took her attorneys this long to notice that? (Ok, I assume they filed the appeal a while ago, but isn't this sort of thing the reason that the sides are required to share their evidence with each other in advance? Shouldn't this have been caught before the trial ended?)

Last night I got a call from a TV-market-research outfit. First they asked how many nights anyone in the house watches anything that airs during prime time, and after thinking a moment I said "4". (I should have said "3"; I forgot that Jack & Bobby airs on Sunday at 6, not 8. Oops.) This exactly matches the number of shows anyone in the house watches, so they probably drew an incorrect conclusion from my answer, but I answered the question they asked.

They then asked to speak with the oldest male resident age 18-49, but he said talking to him would be pointless so they took me instead. It sounds like I get to be part of a test market for some new shows; they'll call me to ask me to watch something and, if I do, they'll call me right afterwards to get my feedback. Could be interesting, and if not there's no obligation, so I told them sure. Who knows, they might air something that's really good but risky, and maybe my feedback will count for something. We'll see. Not as good as being a Nielsen family, but we do what we can. :-)

Neverwhere

Nov. 30th, 2004 11:33 pm
cellio: (B5)
Last night and tonight I (re-)watched the BBC miniseries Neverwhere, written by Neil Gaiman. I had forgotten how well-done it is in many ways. If you liked the Sandman comic book, you'll probably enjoy this show too.

Neverwhere focuses on Richard Mayhew, a businessman (banker?) in London who gets sucked into the underworld. Not underworld like in mafia -- underworld as in a different world that exists beneath the streets of London and that is populated by some very other-worldly sorts of folks. Gaiman seems to do particularly well with putting ordinary people in extraordinary situations and making good story come out the other end. One of the things I liked about Sandman is that despite the millieu, I felt I was reading about people. Maybe not people who could ever exist on Earth, but people nonetheless. Some of the core characters in Neverwhere share that quality.

There are stock characters, and caricatures, to be sure. The visible bad guys (who I keep wanting to call Guido and Luigi though those aren't their names) are stereotypical but well-done and just the right blend of archtype and creep. The enigmatic Marquis is a mystery until the end. Door, the sweet young thing at the center of the conflict, seems helpless but isn't entirely so.

At the center of this is Richard, who doesn't really fit in either world and is now caught between them. The resolution of his story is nicely done, but I won't say more lest I spoil things.

There is one bit of cinematography (or art design, or something -- not sure where to place the credit) that was very effective. Somewhere in each episode we see this sequence of images -- the first time it's a dream, but not always -- that doesn't make a lot of sense. It's always the same sequence. Over the course of the six episodes, the meanings of the images become clear. Nice.

In general the production values are, um, toward the lower end, but you know what? I don't care. It was well-done within what was apparently a limited budget. I care a lot more about story than about sets and props.

Neverwhere was released on DVD in the US last year. (That's good, because Nth-generation PAL-to-NTSC tapes aren't always so wonderful. :-) ) The show aired in 1996.

Caveat: There is also a book. I read the book before seeing the show. I didn't know it had been made into a TV show when I found the book, actually. When I learned about the TV show I thought it was based on the book. Nope -- other way around. The book is a novelization. I think I might have enjoyed the show more if I had not read the book first.

cellio: (avatar-face)
That was cute. The TV show Jack and Bobby is (mostly) set in present-day US. Wednesday's episode was set on election night 2004 and included a scene referring to the outcome. Obviously they had two versions of that scene prepared; I assume they were smart enough to have three. I wonder how much lead time they needed. It's network TV, not syndication, so I'm guessing they had until about 30 seconds before that scene aired to choose.

Grouper is quickly becoming my favorite fish to cook with. (But where do they get these names? :-) ) When baking fish there's a fairly small window in which the fish is cooked all the way through but not over-cooked. This window seems to be wider with this particular fish. I don't know why, but I'm not complaining. (It's also a fairly sturdy fish without strong flavor, meaning you can do just about anything to it.)

Tomorrow my company is having its annual retreat, so I won't be online. Usually they have these on some mid-week day; this year it's a Friday and after the time change, so I'll have to leave early due to Shabbat. Fortunately, it's in a location that's not hard to drive to and from. (There's one site we've used in the past for which my reaction would be to not go unless I could ride with someone willing to leave early.)

(Shabbat before 5:00, all of a sudden, feels weird. I'll get used to it, of course; I always do.)

Our company plans to grow pretty substantially over the coming year, so I assume a major theme of the retreat will be growth and change. We've got a lot of good people, so I think we'll mostly come through this growth fine, but there are landmines we have to watch out for, mostly (based on past experience) in the areas of communication, general management, and (avoiding) disenfranchising people.

cellio: (moon)
We had a clear sky for last night's eclipse, though things were darker than I expected. Yeah, duh, "dark" is part of the definition -- I mean that I was somehow expecting the moon to be closer to red than it was.

There are only two classes at the upcoming Academy (SCA event) that specifically interest me. (Thanks, [livejournal.com profile] dagonell, for the list.) Naturally, they are scheduled against each other. Sigh. (They weren't on the previous draft.) There are some classes that I wouldn't mind taking so it's probably worth going, mind; I'm just a little frustrated. (The advance information doesn't include names of teachers [update: just added, yay], which could make a difference for classes I wouldn't attend just based on title. A good teacher can make all the difference, and we have some of those in this kingdom.) Still, it looks like a weaker slate than I'm used to.

A news story reported that someone was convicted of "attempted first-degree intentional homicide". I thought the difference between homicide and manslaughter was intent, meaning there's no such thing as unintentional homicide. So I'm assuming sloppy writing here, though I'll admit to being a little confused at times about the degree thing, which might be relevant. My impression is that "first degree homicide" means "I specifically meant to kill you, in cold blood if necessary, you scum", that "third degree manslaughter" means "I was doing something I should have known could kill someone, but I sure didn't mean to kill or hurt anyone, let alone you specifically", and that everything else falls in between.

To the writers on West Wing: we want our characters back; could you repeat the ransom demand?

The relevant network [1] moved Jack and Bobby into the same time slot as West Wing. That's a smart move, as the show seems to be aimed at the same viewers (though the shows are very different) and WW is floundering. But I also wonder how much scheduling actually matters these days; doesn't just about every TV-viewing household have at least one recording device? Competing shows aren't the problem they once were.

[1] Yeah, branding is real effective on me... I notice the intrusive logo on the screen but just don't retain the data, and the VCR takes care of remembering what channel it's on.

cellio: (sleepy-cat ((C) Debbie Ohi))
I just got mail from Amazon.uk telling me that the third series of 24 is being released in a couple weeks. Now I know that sometimes a "series" in the UK doesn't equal a "season" in the US, and the third season just finished here, so that made me wonder if the UK edition is breaking up seasons the way they did for West Wing early on. Near as I can tell, no. The final episode aired in May and the DVD for the season is available in August. How strange! (I'm assuming that this is a US show, not an import here, as it is a very US-centric show, but Amazon.com has nothing to say about the third season on DVD so far.) Not that I'm buying yet anyway; I just find it curious.

(Noted in passing: fourth season of West Wing in September; second season of Blake's 7 allegedly in October.)

I sometimes wonder about the security implications of the quizzes and other memes that run around LJ. Consider: your passowrd is (I think) stored in a cookie. You follow a link while reading your friends page (so you're probably logged in) to some unvouched-for site where you give your user name as part of getting some bit of content to post in your journal. I don't know a lot about cookies, but isn't it fairly straightforward for a malicious meme-writer to harvest your password that way? I try to never fill those things out while logged in, personally. (Yes, I do sometimes fill them out, out of curiosity -- the ones that are likely to have interesting content, like the mind map and the friends-list-evaluation ones, not the "what kind of eggplant are you?" ones.)

The two instances of Giant Eagle that I shop at seem to have both stopped carrying my cats' favorite food (Tender Vittles). While googling to try to find out if the product had been discontinued (no one at the store seemed to know anything), I found a place where I can mail-order it by the case for about what I normally pay for it. Ok, that works. Gee, I wonder if I can mail-order the cat litter under similar circumstances, rather than shlepping it home from the store myself? I'll have to try that.

This afternoon I attended a bridal shower for a friend. I so do not know how to be a girly girl. :-) It was a fun time, but there was a lot more estrogen in the air than I'm used to.

cellio: (avatar-face)
Dani now appears to be hooked on The Twelve Kingdoms, a Japanese anime series. I'll call that a successful birthday present. :-) (I started with anime that I already know he likes and then looked to see what people who like those also like. There is always risk in this approach.)

(Is "Japanese anime" redundant? I don't know if there are other sources, which is why I specified.)

I bought the first two discs (chapters? seasons? each disc has five half-hour episodes, which is unusual by US standards). I learned only later that the first three discs complete the first arc of the story; oh well. (I wonder how many episodes there are in total. It's anime, so probably a bazillion.)

I do not know a lot about anime, so I don't know what's standard and what's innovative. The story begins with three Japanese teenagers being sucked into another world (the twelve kingdoms); they experienced it as someone coming from the other side and bringing them over, and what the other side experinced was a destructive storm. This apparently happens from time to time; the outsiders to that world are seen as responsible for the damage, so they're generally shunned or worse. In this case, the king of one of the twelve kingdoms wants them dead. (Or maybe only some of them.)

During the first ten episodes we learn that it wasn't an accident that these particular people were brought over; one in particular has a destiny to fulfill in this world. She, however, is your typical teenager who has some growing up to do. We start to see that in the second batch of episodes, which is good -- in the first she spent a lot of time whining and snivelling, and it was starting to wear thin.

I like some of the secondary characters we meet, particularly the rat-man we meet in the second batch. ([livejournal.com profile] ralphmelton, I thought of Tobin in our D&D game.) These half-humans/half-animals ("hochi"?) are only a couple steps above out-worlders to most people.

It's a fairy tale of sorts, so at some level we know that the hero is going to end up ok in the end. But it'll be interesting to see how it develops. I think Dani's going to order the next disc soon. (Maybe I should nudge him to get the next disc of Infinite Ryvius at the same time.)

TV meme

Jun. 10th, 2004 10:01 pm
cellio: (mars)
Sure, why not -- it's short. Read more... )
cellio: (avatar)
(No unprotected spoilers that weren't in the preview.)

What the f--- was that? I think I'm done now. Whoever has creative control over there needs to go do something else for a while, far away from the entertainment industry.

I realized as I started to watch that I didn't know whether the show had been renewed. At the end of the episode, I guessed not.

So I bopped over to their web site to see the presumed announcement about the end of the series, only to see an item about how the main star [1] is looking forward to next season. I think this means either breaking the story badly or changing the story to focus almost entirely on Dylan's character, neither of which is appealing to me.

[1] The show -- as opposed to the troupe of actors -- works best as an ensemble; I actually think Dylan is one of the less-interesting characters. I understand that the actor playing Dylan sees it differently, though, and he gained some creative control a while back. Pity about that.

spoilage )

weekend

Mar. 1st, 2004 07:35 pm
cellio: (mandelbrot)
We had an infusion of gamers Saturday. It was a fun day. We had some people who could come early but couldn't stay, and others who could come late, and some who could come for the whole day, so we did some juggling to make it work out. We ended up playing Settlers of Katan in the afternoon and then switching over to two longer games, with dinner in there somewhere. Dani really wanted to play Republic of Rome (and I didn't -- but we had eight people anyway), so four of them played RoR and the rest of us played McMulty. RoR is a longer game, so our group ended up with a fair bit of socializing before the other group finished and joined us. Long day, but fun. (It's just as well that we bailed on the group brunch the next day, though, even though that would have been fun.)

Sunday evening we had dinner with friends from my synagogue (the same folks whose seder I went to last year when Dani got sick; they've also invited us to other parties). It was a fun evening. Another couple (also from the synagogue) was there too. I worried a bit that Dani would feel left out even though he's met all these people on many occasions, but it wasn't a problem. There was enough of a geek density to work. :-)

I think it may be time to give up on Andromeda. It's been a while since the show was actually good; Sunday night I fell asleep during this week's show and found that this didn't really affect my enjoyment of it. Um, yeah. There was a change in creative control about a year ago (I think) and things went downhill then, but I held on in case it was just transition pains. But now, two of the most interesting characters are gone (for all practical purposes, in the case of Rev Bem -- the character as shown this week is not the one we know), and the stories have been more and more about action at the expense of plot. Yawn.


A few months ago the Contractor Who Rarely Returns promised to find the source of the water damage to the ceiling in the front hall and deal with it. (This damage is almost directly below a spot in the bathroom that is, in turn, damaged from an apparent roof leak, but he thinks that's a coincidence. We have been hypothesizing a bathtub-related plumbing problem, though a plumber we had in a while ago hadn't found anything suspicious.) In both cases, we were probably snookered by the sellers; the CWRR pointed out places where problems had been covered up rather than fixed.

So anyway, the contractor hasn't done anything yet, though some supplies have moved around so we know he's been here. We still have the crack in the ceiling.

Sunday the toilet overflowed (sigh), and we heard the unmistakable sound of running water coming from downstairs. (New experience for us.) Oh joy. The good news is that we didn't lose a chunk of ceiling; the bad news (on reflection) is that the water stopped after several minutes and did not return on subsequent flushes. Why is that bad news? Because plumbing problems are probably easier to fix; it sounds to me like our bathroom floor is suspect (which may, of course, be caused by a plumbing problem too). I was hoping for, say, a cracked supply pipe, or even a broken seal on the toilet, that we could fix and be done with. So I guess it's now time to (1) poke the CWRR and (2) call someone else because we'd like the work to be done sooner rather than later. Not that this is a sure bet, of course; we wouldn't still be depending on the CWRR if contractors in general showed up when they said they would and did the work they said they'd do.

(In case you're wondering, the CWRR replaced the Conractor Who Never Returned, who disappeared off the face of the planet mid-job about half a year after we bought the house. Fortunately, while he owed us work, he had about the right amount of money from us when he vanished, so we eventually decided to call it even.)

cellio: (mars)
What do you do if you're Hindu and your cow ate your diamonds? (link courtesy of [livejournal.com profile] insomnia).

This QotD post from [livejournal.com profile] dglenn on conservative Episcopalians and marriage is worth checking out.

[livejournal.com profile] goljerp wrote a while back that he had a dream that I wrote something about Mars, but I have not been inspired. So he'll just have to settle for a picture (and the knowledge that Opportunity seems to be happy so far).

I recently picked up the first season of M*A*S*H on DVD. (This used to be one of my favorite shows.) It's nice to be able to watch the episodes without the laugh track. The user interface is a little funky, though; instead of selecting this once and playing through the disc, you have to individually select each episode and choose this option. There doesn't seem to be a "just play the episodes in order until I say to stop" option, like there has been on every other DVD I've played so far. How odd.

Tomorrow is Baldur's appointment with the kitty dentist. I'm banking on the theory that a cat who is sleepy and lazy at the best of times will be especially groggy at 7am, and that getting him into a carrier unassisted will not be hard. Catching him is easy, but that's an awful lot of cat to try to manhandle.

Only two roads that form part of my commute had been plowed this morning. One of them was the street on which my garage opens. Had they not plowed it, I would have been able to just force the car out without shoveling -- but not with the mound the plow left for me. If I have to shovel my way out through plow-supplied mounds, I'd at least like to have plowed main roads. :-) (Everything was passable on the way home tonight.)

cellio: (moon-shadow)
Shortly after midnight someone suggested that as a motto for the year ("2004: looking good so far"), or its variation ("...doesn't suck so far"). I like it, though I prefer the more positive spin. :-)

We went to a party that had a younger and rowdier crowd than we're used to. We had considered going there for a while, trying to find out if a certain traditional party was actually being held this year (we hadn't heard), and then ended up not hopping anyway. Still, we got to spend time chatting with assorted friends, which was nice. We saw [livejournal.com profile] lefkowitzga, [livejournal.com profile] tangerinpenguin, [livejournal.com profile] alfiechat, [livejournal.com profile] arslan_ibn_daud, and others.

Today we went to the traditional new-year's-day brunch and party ("replace all those electrolytes you lost last night"). Good food, good company, less game-playing than last year, and maybe a few fewer people (not sure). I was pleased that one particular family did not show up -- bad parents resulting in bad kids makes for no joy for everyone else. Enjoyed seeing (among others) [livejournal.com profile] lefkowitzga, [livejournal.com profile] lyev, [livejournal.com profile] rani23, [livejournal.com profile] tangerinpenguin, and [livejournal.com profile] lrstrobel. Missed seeing a few people at either party.

We came home and watched the rest of the first DVD of Infinite Ryvius, which we found out in episode $4 is pronounced re-VAY-us, not REE-vee-us as we had thought. I think we'll order the other two DVDs. Then we finished off the last two episodes of B5 season 2, though we failed to find the gag reel advertised in the Amazon product description. Bummer.

Tomorrow I plan to install my new scanner and, for once, take a leisurely approach to Shabbat dinner. (No rushing home from work! Yay!) I'm going to use our new warming plate for Shabbat lunch; we'll see if that gives me good options that the crock pot doesn't. (The crock pot is all about moist foods, while the warming plate can accommodate drier ones like roasted chicken.) Saturday promises an interesting D&D session as my part of the party decides what to do about rescuing the other part. I've got some ideas that could prove interesting. :-)

I'm making good progress on the Torah portion I'm chanting in two weeks, but I need to spend more time on that in the next few days too.
cellio: (mars)
More snow! Whee! It's not unpleasant, though I do wonder what the state of things will be tomorrow morning. It's Sunday, so nothing nearby seems to have been plowed. (Haven't gone far.)

This afternoon we watched the first few episodes of an anime series called "Infinite Ryvius". Dani picked it up recently after seeing a couple episodes at a con. It looks like it will be good. I'm not all that familiar with anime. (This edition has an English dialogue track, which I consider to be a requirement. I think Dani's content with subtitles, which is good for him because I think most anime comes that way.)

Yesterday we had some folks over for gaming. We played History of the World in the afternoon; I think this was my first game with a full six players. If my die-rolling on the final turn hadn't absolutely sucked, I might have been able to win. (I spent most of the game in the vicinity of third place.) Britain in its 19th/early-20th-century colonial phase, with "naval supremacy" to boot, is not supposed to get whumped everywhere it tries to invade. Not that I'm bitter. :-)

After dinner one person had to leave and we had one new arrival, but I was feeling gamed out and didn't want to play more. That left five people, the optimal number for most Rio Grande games, so they broke out Puerto Rico and had fun.

Thursday night was the D&D game. Read more... )

cellio: (Monica)
My mother is sick, so we're not visiting them tomorrow after all. I wonder what I should do for lunch tomorrow. I think the correct thing to do on erev Yom Kippur is to have a large lunch including a large slab of protein, followed later by a moderate dinner. I don't have much in the way of large slabs of protein in the house just now, and I'm not going to fight the zoo at Kosher Mart on erev Yom Kippur, so I'll try to find a good fish option. (I'm still trying to figure out the mechanics of fast prep.) Someone pointed out to me that fruits like melons and grapes are really time-release water, so that'll be part of dinner.

I just watched the season opener of Andromeda. No Tyr Anasazi in the credits. (He left the crew at the end of last season, but that didn't necessarily mean he was leaving the show.) Pity; he was an interesting character, and nice to look at besides. :-) I wonder what happened; I get the impression that he was one of the more popular characters, so I doubt it was a marketing decision.

One of the pieces of spam waiting for me tonight had a pitch (well, subject line) that I couldn't imagine being attractive to people of the target gender. So I checked that assumption with Dani, who cringed just like I expected him to. The subject: "stay hard for 72 hours". Ouch! What were they thinking?! Who are they trying to attract?

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags