<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:idx="urn:atom-extension:indexing" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org" idx:index="no">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-04-14:58489</id>
  <title>Monica</title>
  <subtitle>Monica</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>Monica</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cellio.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://cellio.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2022-01-03T05:09:02Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="cellio" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-04-14:58489:2107710</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cellio.dreamwidth.org/2107710.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://cellio.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=2107710"/>
    <title>Y2K22 bug in Exchange</title>
    <published>2022-01-03T05:09:02Z</published>
    <updated>2022-01-03T05:09:02Z</updated>
    <category term="tech"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;We all got through the anticlimactic Y2K bug 22 years ago, and the next digital calendar crisis isn't expected until 2038 (Unix epoch), but... &lt;a href="https://www.theverge.com/2022/1/2/22863950/microsoft-exchange-y2k22-bug"&gt;apparently Microsoft Exchange has a Y2k22 bug&lt;/a&gt;, which prevents email from being delivered until sysadmins apply a manual fix.  Just what they wanted to hear on a holiday weekend.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Apparently Exchange is using a funny string representation of dates and then trying to convert that string to a numeric format, and with the bump in year it now doesn't fit into a long.  Really, I'm not making this up.  Why they don't use standard date formatting, I don't know.  I don't know much about how Exchange is put together.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This linked &lt;a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/rt91z6/exchange_2019_antimalware_bad_update/"&gt;Reddit post&lt;/a&gt;, which has had several updates, includes this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Interestingly, this fix includes a change to the format of the problematic update version number; the version number now starts with “21” again, to stay within the limits of the ‘long’ data type, for example: “2112330001”. So, Happy December 33, 2021!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=cellio&amp;ditemid=2107710" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
