cellio: (sleepy-cat)
2008-02-18 11:11 pm

short takes

Airfare to Israel these days costs how much?! This may require more thought.

The local SCA choir started some new songs tonight, including Salamone Rossi's Kedusha, which has been in the files waiting to emerge for a few years. It's a pretty piece as a whole; some of the individual lines are a little funky. I think it's going to sound really nifty when we've learned it. The director quite reasonably asked me to lead people through the pronunciation; I had forgotten how awkward I now find transliteration. I should have just read from the Hebrew. Oh well.

The choir performed at an event last weekend, including one joint piece with our consort. That was fun, and the consort is bigger than it's often been in the past. We'll be doing a joint performance at Pennsic.

Last night Dani and I went to a pot-luck dinner (by local SCA folks). The theme was "black history month"; most people interpreted this as calling for African recipes. (I would have figured we'd get some Carribean, but no.) The result was that almost everything involved at least two of: rice, beans, peanuts. (I made a West-African vegetable stew with peanuts, served over rice.) It was all quite tasty, though we usually manage more variety. :-) (Themes sometimes act as themes and sometimes as loose inspiration. We once hosted one with the theme "once in a blue moon", which produced round foods and stuff with blueberries.)

I owe a few sets of interview answers. Thanks for the interesting questions.

The Pardes of pastoral care by Velveteen Rabbi is an interesting, multi-level take on the sometimes-difficult task of relating to people.

Two interesting studies reported by [livejournal.com profile] siderea. "Rat Park" was new to me; who knew that rats use drugs to relieve boredom rather than out of addiction?

Signs you might not be from LJ originally; I forget now who pointed this one out.

Qualities people will pay for even if there are free options, via [livejournal.com profile] dsrtao.
cellio: (moon-shadow)
2006-01-22 09:32 pm
Entry tags:

thoughts on pastoral care

I have this perception that there are three broad aspects to the job of a clergyperson. (If I've missed some, please say so.) The first is in the area of knowledge; in the case of a rabbi it's knowing our texts and the rabbinic process and applying halacha and so on. The second is all the performative aspects: leading worship, public speaking (giving sermons and lectures), conducting special events, and so on. The third is the collection of personal-interaction skills that I lump into "pastoral care": comforting those who are troubled, guiding spiritual seekers, visiting the sick, working with congregants with special issues, and so on.

I consider the first two to be tractable -- not easy, of course, but I understand how to get there given suitable time and effort -- but I sometimes think I just don't grok the third. Sure, sometimes, but the path for turning "sometimes" into "most of the time" isn't clear, and I don't know what concrete endeavors lead to improvement here. People are hard.

This shabbat I found myself in two very different situations in this space, and in both cases I felt confident and didn't worry about being out of my league. That was a bit surprising.

The first one was the easier one (and if this were the only one I probably wouldn't be writing this post). Someone who's been thinking about converting to Judaism for at least a year, but has still felt some ties to Christianity, told me he's decided that Judaism is right but he's extremely hesitant to tell his parents and he wanted my advice. While the explicit question was about dealing with his family, I sensed an implicit question of "how do I know this is really the right choice?". I talked with him about family stuff and how my own family had surprised me with how accepting they were, and we talked about some logistics. But as I talked about my own family I wove in a few bits of how I had come to realize that this was the right path for me. I never said "you'll know because of X", because how can I know what will work for someone else?, but I gave him things to think about.

The second is one of the regular attendees and participants in our synagogue. She told me that a dear friend, a gentile, had died and she had gone to the funeral. She said she didn't participate in the liturgy, it not being hers, and that at one point during it she had said the mourner's kaddish quietly to herself. She wanted to know if this was ok.

"Ok" is such a loaded concept. Was she asking me for a halachic opinion? It seemed unlikely that she wanted me to talk to her about the preconditions for saying kaddish, and similarly, it seemed unlikely that she was asking whether one can say kaddish for a friend (rather than just specified relatives). And anyway, she was asking after the fact (b'diaved). Was she asking whether this was offensive to Christians? That seems unlikely, especially as she did it non-invasively. So I opted for the path of comfort and said something to the effect that it's traditional that we say kaddish among Jews, but mourning is primarily about bringing comfort to the mourner and this obviously brought her comfort. I then told her that when my grandfather died (while I was going through conversion), I attended the high-church Greek-Orthodox funeral and then we proceeded to the graveyard for the burial. I found a time where I wouldn't bother anyone else, stepped a few paces away from the service in progress, and said kaddish for him, reading from a copy I'd tucked into a pocket just in case it became relevant.

I don't know if I handled either of those the "right" way or the way my rabbi would have, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that I had apparently-useful instincts and enough perceptive ability to see and think about the underlying questions. And both people seemed to be glad that we'd talked, which is a good sign.

But people are still hard. :-)

cellio: (star)
2003-11-01 10:19 pm

Shabbat

You know, I never noticed this detail about the story of Noah before: he doesn't take isolated pairs of anything. He takes seven pairs of each kosher species (which I already knew), and he takes two pairs of each non-kosher species. Not one pair. Somehow I had always read this as "two, one male and one female", but that's not what it says.

Another detail: as a kid I wondered why doves hadn't died out, given that Noah sent one out and it never returned. But, of course, he had backups. Did we just not read very carefully in CCD, I wonder?

Of course, this doesn't take into account any animal births that occurred on the ark. They were in there for close to a year, not just the 40 days of the flood, so who knows how many bunnies came out? I wonder if this is addressed in the talmud somewhere.

Comment from someone Friday: he hadn't been able to really envision anything as big as the mabul (flood) until this week's news from California. I hadn't thought about it in those terms before.

Shabbat )